i deliberately took off all limits
Context from
intrepid
#69132
2025-04-09 21:17
Agree also ; so are the limits necessary is the question of can you trust TDH decision making to enforce its own limits. If the next meme da Vinci turns up should the TDH be able to regulate their submissions or some long term limits lock them out after 3 cards
sorry brosef
Context from
arsonic
#69131
2025-04-09 21:16
DAMNIT
we are not going to vote for 100 @[arsonic] cards in a row (even if he submitted 100 cards in a row which he wouldn't anyway)
and i have pretty close to 100% confidence
it is clear that the collection would not be as good if we did 100 cards in a row from @[arsonic] or something
not for some complex game theory of incentives
primarily because they want them to be good
yes, though I have an even 'stronger' version of this statement. i think people will curate the memes correctly through a sense of professionalism
Context from
intrepid
#69110
2025-04-09 21:13
All I am saying this is anti fragile and they wont vote for extractive behaviour as it will cost them more to do so in damage to the cards held for the TDH
we are on the right track
like i want pizza tonight and you want steak
it is normal
is not a system failure
things like 10 out of the 100 people would have preferred a different card today
by this metric we are scoring 100/100 so far
that will make good decisions in aggregate, on the whole, and over time
the theory was/is that TDH is generally distributed into intelligent and well-meaning hands
but overall very very close to what I think we would have done
maybe a bit more pushing on a couple of designs
maybe a bit of ordering difference
i don't think @[6529er] and I would have been much different
the group picked 5 very good picks
i have to say the group is very hard on itself
TDH is doing fine
Context from
intrepid
#69058
2025-04-09 21:00
In the mean time it’s more of a constitutional monarchy rather than a TDH republic ; so we the children if we are out of line then 6529 can come in and clean the place up with his TDH ;)
lolololol absolutely not
Context from
intrepid
#69083
2025-04-09 21:06
We also have a secondary vote and that’s do we mint it ; so any circle jerking which make sneak though we can just not mint and that removes any financial reward for them
"Otherwise we just become a group of people taking the piss out of day to day events"
not going to happen mostly because it is really hard to pull great immediately time relevant art on the spot :)
Context from
intrepid
#68934
2025-04-09 20:17
Sorry that glitched and disappeared . I was saying that I feel a few of those cards is ok but I prefer to see most cards focus on the most powerful decentralised memes we are trying to push like freedom to transact and decentralised digital rights
amazing!!!
Context from
ArtWard3n
#68195
2025-04-09 12:23
Gm y’all! Proud dad moment realizing my duaghter’s Seize profile is a year old and accumulating TDH (thanks to @[MintFace])
great!
Context from
ArtWard3n
#68195
2025-04-09 12:23
Gm y’all! Proud dad moment realizing my duaghter’s Seize profile is a year old and accumulating TDH (thanks to @[MintFace])
:6529spin:
Context from
BrynnAlise
#67425
2025-04-08 20:51
do you know how much we need an emoji response - I don't want to be talking too much but wanted to like the last 2 posts. Really appreciate you sharing all this Animated. Such great points.
yup
Context from
baiwei
#67326
2025-04-08 19:31
Is it $BGLD Beanie?
because it makes for more intense tweets
but he tweets in that way
he may or may not believe this, I am not saying he does not
he is partially trolling as always
Context from
DarrenSRS
#65466
2025-04-07 09:37
what do we feel about this btw?
https://x.com/beaniemaxi/status/1908969322908614778
just like 1,000 other factors will be relevant over time
of course "who made the card" is relevant to that discussion
it is to fill that next spot with the most appropriate card for that next spot
and so on
to tell them if their work is good or bad
the purpose of the meme is not to rate artists
or worriying even for 1 second if articulate got bumped from a spot
there is no pathway to excellence that starts with blinding yourself
the goals are excellence, contribution, public goods, etc
in 10 years, i would imagine any work being diligenced by ASIs, by humans, getting checked 50 different ways
the long-term is that this is the most excellent work across any domain that the network wants to highlight
but even worse it is a conceptual disaster for the long-term
blind voting would be a disaster in the immediate term
100% this would happen
Context from
maybe
#67269
2025-04-08 19:12
so youre saying someone could copy a famous artist's visual signature hoping to pass it off or trick people into thinking it's famous person? like lascaux did with banksy
:)
and by those, @[maybe]is voting for more DF
on-chain actions are what drive the network though :)