will serve as the best guide to artists on what is needed
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
20,678
matching drops
#1574220
2026-10-24 20:01
eventually the public nature of the voting
if we have good taste
the primary responsibility is: having good taste
i do not think the primary responsibility of the curators is fixing everyone's pieces
One question I often think about is how we prevent curation fatigue as time goes on in here. In public, it’s harder to say you don’t like something, whereas in a more private setting, honest feedback is easier to give and receive. I often think about this curation project in the context of avoiding the Abilene paradox. I feel a lot go along with the perceived consensus.
I was like "checkmake the centralized [where is the missing word]"
like the first time I saw it in main stage before I even got to the visuals
but not in some type of cute cat picture way
like as it is grammatically incorrect
and grammatically the language grates
concept is forced I think
@[punk6529] Since you agreed to do coaching
Please share feedback on my submission
yes i think we need to normalize resubmission but I think also we could have a feature that renotifies the voters that it has been resubmitted
I think no editing is best
blondie indeed! very cool
@[punk6529]. This my favorite image of her that was collected on SR.
what I would have liked to see more of is this happening in the other direction - people doing some work together in advance before presenting
we have to figure out how to make it work in this format
we have to figure out how to make it work in this format
no that is not the vibe
When it was announced it would be fully decentralised initially I thought people would be selected based on a prototype ; then that would go into some private wave (with some artistic volunteers who would the kind of replicate the huddle that was previously artist/6529/6529er/etc to do that final polishing of the card. Hard to implement and not have it look like an art cabal however (TDH would have to select the curation team etc)
does she have a name?
Oh she's one of my favorite grizzlies. She had just lost three cubs to a male grizzly when I spent this time with her and photographed her. I got to watch her on this evening, and then again the next morning - my most favorite shot of her is owned by Me Llamo Matt on SuperRare
oh wow, ok - good thing to debug and figure out why!!!
https://6529.io/my-stream?wave=fdd03eb3-68d8-4b53-9b34-aed5f5fa193e&serialNo=98591
@[BrynnAlise] did you actually see that bear or is it conceptual?
?
Core and mobile are no longer working for me ;(
this is complicated to implement well - needs deeper thinking i think - feeling my way on this, watching etc
Yes I'm aware. Just sharing it for the discussion.
Also an interesting point, @[punk6529] - Would a feature to edit card be helpful if you're not in top 3? I think most artists don't want to start over to garner the votes.
using the power of ASI, in our network state we will use "garbage bins"
NYers will be awed by this display of technological force
who is going to govern the rats?
like education or religion or nationalism is a form of utility
and sure that is a form of utility but highly abstract
in principle, but of course I cannot do this, you have to do this, this model can extend until we are in a decentralized manner not only picking the pieces in the gallery but running the gallery and then the coffeeshop next to it and then the whole block and in the end all NYC
so people including most of all the high TDH people want to keep coming to the gallery
current job is to make sure TDH picks the pieces well
this is the first SZN TDH is doing something different than a gallery -> it is picking the pieces in the gallery
if you look at TDH until this SZN, it fits perfectly in trad-art model. "you get higher on the allowlist" and yes real galleries do that too - they call their top collectors when a new piece comes in before they call their small collectors which is very normal
it approximately never works
is really basically ultra cringe stuff that the promoters are theoretically going to do in order to drive the value up
the base understanding of "utility" to most people
in the specific NFT world we live in
but is not the same thing
which is true ofc
sure but this is stretching the definition of utility. eventually you get to "giving money to charity is utility because you feel good"
I think with decentralized curation people have had some taste of power in terms of having a say and influencing decisions
If influencing decisions in network is a utility - Maybe people are looking at TDH different
However the top 100 Holders have been here since TDH wasn't even a thing
he wants to have intergenerational infrastructure that people can build on "the infinite garden"
it is 100% what his goal is
and if you read all Vitalik's stuff
but it is true the same thing applies for ETH
without this there is nothing else in crypto
all the early crypto exchanges
Have things really been built on BTC though? I feel like BTC is more of a store of value. ETH feels like it has had the most built on it
which I think is what we are talking about with the passport card and I do not know for sure because I still don't understand on the concept
is "buy something from me and you will get an extra goodie"
what most web3 / NFT people mean by utility
could permissionlessly build things on BTC with strong security assurances
but the way it become useful in the future is because thousands of people who are not satoshi nakamoto
if you bought BTC in 2010 because you thought it would be useful in the future, sure you are buying it for utility
so i think we are using utility in both valid and different ways
it is like BTC in spirit, not like moonbirds in spirit