šš
Wave
Meme Rehab and Dev Clinic
Generate Summary
Choose a timeframe to see summary coverage.
Drops
-
-
Hey friends, I hope youāre doing well. This is my first time submitting a meme card, and Iād love to get your thoughts on this piece do you think itās suitable for a meme card?
-
@[RegularDad] would love your feedback on what you think about this idea. Iāve been thinking about how we can build something that can fund the trip on its own every year, without having to submit a new Meme Card each time. https://x.com/SummerMaxis/status/2099494141990445517
-
I think it's a good idea and worth trying
-
Thanks for the feedback. Another experiment to get TDH i just posted about. I think as people vote a lot of people will be interested in knowing what is TDH in CT. https://x.com/SummerMaxis/status/2099866935148282195
-
-
-
GM Rehab Iām working on a new submission, and this is my progress on day 3. Fully hand-drawn, no animation, no overthinking, just jpeg hehe. What do you guys think? Any feedback would mean a lot to me.
-
@[RegularDad] @[blocknoob] My meme card submission Freedom To Experiment's long term goal is to make name a mineral named Summerite. ( Based on the summer.jpg artwork by XCOPY ) In the meanwhile another experiment is to make a break even for the minters who are minting my card. I have an app that is already generating revenue which I talked in my update today. So essentially I will be using the 50% artist share for an existing revenue generating business to generate revenue and give back 100% of the mint funs which the minters have minted. More info about me and the card is on the website https://summerite.org/ https://x.com/SummerMaxis/status/2092238491312849301
-
I work as editor of some publications: - Virtualia Journal: https://periodicos.ufop.br/virtualia-journal - Virtualia (Magazine): https://virtualiamagazine.blogspot.com - Philosophical Investigation Series (42 books): https://wp.ufpel.edu.br/nepfil/serie-investigacao-filosofica/ - Previously funded by John Templeton Foundation: https://www.templeton.org/grant/serie-investigacao-filosofica-improving-knowledge-and-philosophical-competences-of-brazilian-researchers-and-students
-
Speaking of which, what do you think of us building an academic journal here? Or maybe not academic. I have Virtualia magazine, fro m which I am an editor, and I could work together with The Memes community, by publishing texts writtens by writers here.
-
Finally I end up with this idea, The tittle still āSparks of Becomingā the idea is, forging 6529 physical stuff into digital binary that says the same 6529 in digital binary . Itās representative of, when we want to make physical stuff in reality to be nft, we have to photographs or take video of it to be digital. Any suggestions ser? @[RegularDad] @[MadaCollects] @[blocknoob]
-
Still undecided on which is better: using 6529 as the hammer or as the piece being forged.
-
gl ser
-
-
gm
-
GM! š Iām thinking of submitting this for the 6529 meme. Any suggestions or feedback would be really appreciated. Thank you! š @[blocknoob] @[RegularDad]
-
I liked it. You could try it without the text and use a title like āstill hodlingā or āstill waitingā
-
Thanks for the suggestion @[RegularDad]. Went with it , just submitted!
-
-
-
The idea would be to fundraise for this project with the community. According to the resources received, we could give a better prize at the hackathon for winners, thus stimulating larger participation. The hackathon is part of a larger research project about the perception of permissibility of AI use by academic agents, which has a presencial meeting as part. By its turn, the hackathon is part of this presencial meeting. Our main intention is develop social goods able to help us to develop integrity in AI use by academic agents, such as students, professors, researchers, translators, reviewers, editors, evaluators.
-
I didnāt read all of this tbh. there has been discussion about holding a hackathon, but this seems more like a donation for a hackathon. we have voted in cards for donations before, but I think people want to see more of a direct benefit towards the 6529 these days. with this being a sol project and thememes not being sol compatible, idk how it would do
-
In case, if we receive donations from 6529, we could make an EVM path for the hackathon. And maybe the app built could be used inside 6529 community for publishing, in case we develop something like an Publisher or a journal or a magazine. What do you think about that? (The hackathon apps would be for develop automatic integrity for AI use inside papers, books, and other publications)
-
-
-
Hi, friends. I would like to ask you feedback about a project of a hachaton that I want to associate with a future card. Can I do it here?
-
sure
-
Thank you. This is the idea. We have already secured 2000 usd with solana superteam brasil. Hackathon Web3 ā Decentralized Tools for Academic Integrity and AI Transparency Prototypes for Scientific Integrity, Peer Review, and Transparent AI Use in the Brazilian Academic Ecosystem Coordinator: Prof. Dr. Rodrigo Reis Lastra Cid 1. Identification, Framing, and Fundraising This document presents a hackathon initiative integrated with the main research project "Technology in Philosophical Investigation," submitted to the CNPq/FNDCT Universal Call No. 06/2026. The hackathon is designed as a complementary and parallel activity to the broader research effort, functioning as an open innovation laboratory that brings together developers, designers, researchers, and academic agents to create functional prototypes addressing the most pressing challenges of artificial intelligence use in academia. Rather than being tied to any single platform or institutional series, the hackathon aims to generate standalone, open-source tools that can serve the entire Brazilian academic ecosystem, including university presses, research groups, graduate programs, ethics committees, and individual researchers across all regions of the country. The hackathon will take place from July 26 to 30, 2027, as an integral part of the "Technology in Philosophical Investigation" meeting held during the Ouro Preto Winter Festival. The event is coordinated by Professor Rodrigo Reis Lastra Cid, with the hackathon specifically led by Professor Carlos Frederico M. C. Cavalcanti from UFOP's KryptoLab, in strategic partnership with Solana Superteam Brasil, represented by Pedro Marafiotti. The total prize pool amounts to two thousand US dollars, sourced from Solana Superteam Brasil. 2. The Problem and the Opportunity for Innovation The rise of Generative Artificial Intelligence tools has created unprecedented challenges for academic integrity, transparency, and the responsible conduct of research across all disciplines. CNPq Ordinance No. 2,664/2026 established the Policy of Integrity in Scientific Activity, mandating that AI use in any stage of research or writing must be explicitly declared, that AI cannot be listed as author or co-author, and that researchers bear full human responsibility for their work. However, the implementation of these principles faces significant practical obstacles. There is currently no standardized infrastructure for the immutable and publicly verifiable recording of AI declarations. Peer review processes remain vulnerable to confidentiality breaches when evaluators inadvertently or deliberately submit manuscripts to public AI tools. Multi-author and multi-agent collaborative workflows lack mechanisms for transparent tracking of who used AI, at what stage, and for what purpose. Compliance with regulatory requirements depends on self-reporting with no automated verification, and there are no established reputation systems that reward transparent practices. These challenges are not specific to any one institution, series, or platform, but affect the entire academic community. The hackathon is designed to address these systemic challenges by producing functional prototypes that are institution-agnostic, open-source, and readily deployable by any university press, research group, or academic body in Brazil. 3. General and Specific Objectives The general objective of the hackathon is to develop functional, standalone prototypes of decentralized tools that promote transparency, integrity, and traceability in the use of Artificial Intelligence across the entire academic ecosystem. These tools must be designed as public goods, capable of independent operation and integration with various institutional platforms and workflows. The specific objectives include stimulating frontier innovation at the intersection of Web3, artificial intelligence, and scientific integrity; producing open-source code that can be freely adopted and adapted by any Brazilian academic institution; testing the technical viability of decentralized solutions for the core challenges of academic transparency; creating proofs of concept that demonstrate how blockchain technology can address real problems faced by researchers, editors, evaluators, translators, and students; incorporating the empirical findings from the project's research on permissibility criteria into the design of the prototypes; awarding and documenting the best solutions to provide the broader academic community with a portfolio of functional tools; and fostering collaboration between the academic and Web3 development communities, creating a network of talent committed to the ethical and transparent use of AI in research and education. 4. Thematic Axes for Prototype Development The hackathon is structured around five thematic axes, each addressing a fundamental challenge of AI transparency and integrity that transcends any single institution. The first axis focuses on an immutable declaration registry, where teams develop a standalone tool that allows any researcher, editor, or university press to record a cryptographic hash of their AI use declaration on the Solana blockchain, generating a public receipt that can be independently verified by anyone, regardless of institutional affiliation. This tool must be designed as a simple web application or browser extension that accepts structured data about AI use and outputs a verifiable transaction identifier. The second axis addresses confidentiality in peer review, challenging teams to create a monitoring tool that detects when reviewers paste confidential manuscript content into public AI tools such as ChatGPT, DeepL, or Claude, logging such attempts and alerting editors through a decentralized notification system. This tool must be deployable as a standalone desktop application or browser extension that works with any manuscript management system, protecting the confidentiality of submissions across all disciplines. The third axis involves collaborative traceability for multi-agent workflows, requiring teams to develop a decentralized identity and contribution tracking system where each participant in an academic project, including researchers, translators, reviewers, and editors, can independently register their AI usage using digital signatures and have their individual declarations aggregated into a consolidated transparency report. This tool must be designed for generic adoption by any research group or collaborative project, regardless of discipline or institutional context. The fourth axis consists of an automatic compliance verification tool that receives structured data from AI declarations and validates whether all mandatory fields are completed, whether the declared type of use conforms to normative standards, and whether the submission meets the requirements of CNPq Ordinance No. 2,664/2026. This tool must function as a standalone API or command-line utility that can be integrated into any institutional submission workflow. The fifth axis remains open to free themes, accepting any innovative solution that promotes transparency and scientific integrity through decentralized technologies, provided that the prototype is designed for broad applicability across the academic ecosystem. 5. Methodology, Activities, and Technical Requirements To ensure that the hackathon produces genuinely useful and deployable prototypes, a clear set of technical requirements and methodological guidelines has been established. All prototypes must be developed as standalone applications, libraries, or services that do not depend on any specific institutional platform. Each prototype must include comprehensive documentation in both Portuguese and English, covering installation, configuration, and usage instructions, to facilitate adoption by non-technical users in academic settings. The source code must be released under an open-source license approved by the Open Source Initiative, ensuring that any university, research group, or individual can freely use, modify, and redistribute the tools. All prototypes must include a test suite and a demonstration environment where evaluators can verify functionality without requiring access to proprietary systems. Teams are also required to produce a deployment plan specifying the minimum infrastructure requirements, such as whether the tool requires a server, what blockchain dependencies exist, and how it can be hosted by institutions with varying technical capacities. The pre-event phase runs from January to July 2027. During this period, the organizing committee will define the official rules and evaluation criteria, launch the public call for team registrations, disseminate the opportunity within Web3 and academic communities, and select and confirm participating teams. The empirical research findings from the main project, which map academic intuitions regarding the permissibility of different AI uses, will be made available to all teams as design parameters, ensuring that the prototypes align with the normative expectations of the Brazilian academic community. The hackathon itself occurs over five intense days during the meeting week. The first day is dedicated to the official opening, presentation of the thematic axes and technical requirements, team formation, and initial mentoring sessions. The second and third days are focused on intensive development, with continuous technical mentoring from Solana Superteam Brasil and KryptoLab specialists, alongside thematic mentoring from research group members to ensure conceptual alignment. The fourth day is reserved for finalizing prototypes, preparing presentations, and conducting internal testing. The fifth day features the final project presentations before the evaluation jury, with live demonstrations of functionality, followed by the awards ceremony as part of the main event's closing session. The post-event phase is critical for ensuring that the prototypes transition from hackathon projects to usable public goods. From August to September 2027, the winning teams will polish their documentation, conduct user testing with volunteer academic institutions, and publish the complete source code in open repositories. Throughout 2028, the Philosophical Investigation Group will coordinate a network of beta-testing institutions, including university presses, graduate programs, and ethics committees, who will deploy and evaluate the prototypes in real academic contexts. Feedback from these deployments will be collected and synthesized, and the refined tools will be promoted through academic conferences, workshops, and publications, ensuring that the prototypes achieve their intended impact across the Brazilian academic ecosystem. 6. Evaluation Criteria and Jury Composition The judging panel will be composed of members from the Philosophical Investigation Group, KryptoLab, Solana Superteam Brasil, and invited representatives from our supporters, and from university presses, ethics committees, and academic integrity bodies. The evaluation will consider five criteria, each weighted equally at twenty percent. Innovation and Web3 relevance assess the creative and justified use of blockchain and decentralization, rewarding solutions that demonstrate novel approaches to problems of academic transparency. Conceptual alignment measures how well the prototype incorporates the empirical research distinctions between formal and substantive use, assistive and substitutive use, and analytical and decision-making use, ensuring that the tools reflect the nuanced normative expectations of the academic community. Functional maturity and usability evaluate the technical quality of the prototype, its stability, the completeness of its feature set, and the user experience for non-technical academic users. Potential for adoption and impact analyzes the prototype's capacity to generate real gains in transparency, integrity, and traceability across diverse institutional contexts, considering factors such as ease of deployment, minimal infrastructure requirements, and the clarity of documentation. Finally, openness and replicability assess whether the source code is genuinely reusable, whether the licensing is appropriate, and whether the deployment plan enables other institutions to adopt the tool without requiring deep technical expertise. 7. Prize Distribution The total prize pool amounts to two thousand US dollars, distributed among five winning teams to incentivize the production of a diverse portfolio of functional prototypes. To be eligible for any prize, teams must demonstrate a functional prototype that can operate independently of any specific institutional platform, with clear evidence that the tool can be deployed and used by academic agents across different universities and research contexts. 8. Organizing Team and Supporters The organizing committee is led by Professor Carlos Frederico M. C. Cavalcanti as hackathon coordinator, with overall event coordination by Professor Rodrigo Reis Lastra Cid. The strategic partnership is represented by Pedro Marafiotti from Solana Superteam Brasil, who already gave us 2,000 USD. The committee also includes Professor Dr. Juliano Santos do Carmo as deputy coordinator, Professor Dr. MaurĆcio de Assis Reis as thematic consultant. The judging panel brings together these leaders alongside representatives from university presses, ethics committees, and academic integrity bodies who will serve as external evaluators. The initiative enjoys institutional support from Solana Superteam Brasil, KryptoLab, the Philosophical Investigation Group, NEPFIL-UFPel, and DeScier Science LLM. 9. Detailed Schedule The hackathon schedule spans from early 2027 through late 2028. In January 2027, the official regulations will be finalized, followed by the launch of the public call in February. Throughout March and April, the call will be widely disseminated across both academic and Web3 communities, with particular outreach to developer communities in all Brazilian regions. In May, teams will be selected and confirmed based on their technical expertise and the relevance of their proposed approaches to the thematic axes. By June 2027, the empirical research results and technical specifications will be made available to all participants, alongside the first preparatory online workshops on Solana development and open-source best practices. July 2027 is entirely dedicated to the in-person hackathon from the twenty-sixth to the thirtieth, with intensive development, mentoring, and final presentations. Immediately after the event, during August and September, winning teams will document their prototypes, conduct user testing, and release the source code. From October through December 2027, the Philosophical Investigation Group will coordinate the network of beta-testing institutions. Throughout 2028, the prototypes will be refined based on real-world feedback, and the results will be published in academic journals and presented at conferences, ensuring widespread dissemination and adoption. 10. Budget and Fund Allocation The hackathon budget is entirely dedicated to the prize pool, with no additional costs to the main CNPq project beyond the infrastructure already provisioned for the meeting. Two thousand US dollars are provided by Solana Superteam Brasil. All additional funds will be given directly to the winners, or will allow more winners. The institutional counterpart, provided without charge by the Federal University of Ouro Preto (Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, UFOP), includes physical space, auditoriums, internet, energy, mentoring from professors, certificates, badges, and dissemination through institutional channels. All prototypes are developed using free and open-source tools, and the Solana devnet provides a zero-cost testing environment during the hackathon, ensuring that no technical infrastructure costs are incurred. 11. Deliverables and the Path to Adoption The hackathon will produce a comprehensive set of deliverables designed to maximize adoption across the academic ecosystem. The official regulations and the public call will be published in early 2027. During the event, five functional prototypes will be developed, each accompanied by deployment documentation specifying infrastructure requirements, configuration steps, and user instructions. Immediately following the hackathon, the source code for all awarded prototypes will be made available in open repositories under OSI-approved licenses. A user manual in both Portuguese and English will be produced for each tool, ensuring accessibility for non-technical academic users. The Philosophical Investigation Group will coordinate a network of beta-testing institutions, including university presses, graduate programs, and ethics committees, who will deploy and evaluate the prototypes in real academic contexts throughout 2028. Feedback from these deployments will be collected and synthesized, and the refined tools will be published as stable releases, promoted through academic conferences, workshops, and publications. The entire process, including the hackathon methodology, the resulting prototypes, and the lessons learned from adoption, will be documented in the conference proceedings published by NEPFIL-UFPel, ensuring that the knowledge generated can benefit the broader academic community. 12. Blockchain Architecture The blockchain layer constitutes the core technical innovation of the hackathon, designed to materially implement the ethical and normative principles identified in the empirical research. Rather than serving as an end in itself, this layer provides cryptographic guarantees of immutability, auditability, and agent sovereignty that are essential for building trust in academic transparency systems. Solana was chosen for its high throughput, low transaction costs, and mature development ecosystem, all of which are essential for producing working prototypes within the hackathon's compressed timeline and for ensuring that the tools remain affordable for institutional adoption. The functional prototypes will enable immutable registration of AI declarations through public ledger hashing, decentralized identity management using Solana wallets and digital signatures, traceability of AI interactions in collaborative workflows via smart contracts, on-chain compliance verification with CNPq Ordinance provisions, and reputation scoring for academic agents based on their historical transparency. All of these capabilities will be tested on Solana's free devnet environment during the hackathon. 13. Expected Impact and Alignment with Regulatory Frameworks The expected impact of the hackathon spans multiple dimensions. On the scientific front, it will generate five unprecedented functional prototypes at the intersection of Web3, artificial intelligence, and scientific integrity, with strong potential for publication in philosophy of technology and decentralized science journals. These prototypes will provide empirical evidence for how blockchain technology can address real problems of academic transparency, contributing to both theoretical and applied research. Technologically, it will create an open-source repository containing multiple approaches to smart contracts, identity systems, and transparency tools that can be freely adopted and adapted by any university press, research group, or academic body in Brazil. Institutionally, it will position the participating researchers and institutions as national references in the application of decentralized technologies to academic integrity, attracting further partnerships and investment. Socially, it will strengthen public trust in Brazilian academic production by providing verifiable mechanisms for transparency in AI use, demonstrating that the Brazilian academic community is proactively addressing the challenges posed by emerging technologies. Most importantly, the hackathon directly implements the principles of CNPq Ordinance No. 2,664/2026, as the immutable on-chain registration makes declarations publicly verifiable at any time, digital signatures bind each agent to their specific AI usage, and continuous traceability allows for ongoing audit and identification of deviations. By codifying the conceptual distinctions from the empirical research into structured on-chain metadata, the resulting tools will enable the academic community, ethics committees, and public managers to verify not only whether AI was used, but how and to what degree, thereby transforming abstract normative principles into concrete, operational technological realities that serve the entire Brazilian academic ecosystem.
-
Thank you, Regular Dad. Please, if you can, let me know your feedback?
-
-
-
half crop like this?
-
Looks better to me
-
-
Iām thinking of submitting this as a Memecard. The title is āSparks of Becoming,ā and the description is: āProof of BUIDL, BUIDLing was never passive. Itās the willingness to stand in the fire long enough to change the shape of whatās possible.ā what do you think ser? @[MadaCollects] @[RegularDad] @[blocknoob]
-
I think this better than the others that you have submitted. Something along this thought line could work, but not in its current state. I don't think the bottom half of the image does anything for the meme
-
Thanks ser for the feedback, What do you think I should add or improve to make it a good meme?
-
-
-
oh! i hadn't seen this wave sooner šš«
-
Thanks @[JasonOPhoto] for remembering. If you post in here @[Choen], @[RegularDad] and @[blocknoob] and I can provide some feedback
-
Can i get feedback too?
-
-
Have a good day all
-
Gmeme
-
This is the other photo i made but my original submission is the landscape one, think if the community thinks the portrait version looks better, Iāll submit again ! Any commentary, feedback highly appreciated ! Thanks in advance š¤šš¾
-
Hi everyone submitted Touch Grass, as my submission on 9th after discussing with a few friends i think the landscape version might not fit the meme collection well, the basic idea behind the card was a person getting so consumed by the volatile nature of crypto that they get consumed by the reds missing the better things ( the grass is still green as a metaphor ) outside so itās a commentary or we can say a reminder to keep balance in life with respect to the space and irl !
-
Gmeme Rehab clinicš¹
-
gm, appreciate everyone's input here last week. huge thanks to those that took the time to contribute :sgt_saluting_face:
-
Is it okay if I share it here?
-
You already submitted it so it doesnāt look like you need to post here for feedback. š¤£ i dont tend to vote for subs that rely to heavily on Pepe, punku, or other common figures in The Memes
-
gmeme šø ā would love your feedback on this!
-
Inspired by the first feedback @[crunch] gave me on one of my submissions š https://6529.io/waves/3a450a7b-723a-47af-b91e-b9c70f71f784?serialNo=260892
-
CC: @[RegularDad] @[blocknoob] @[grubnot]
-
this is a funny direction!
-
Haha thanks! Glad you like the direction. Do you think itās ready to submit or any tweaks youād suggest?
-
-
-
-
-
Hey! I submitted my first 6529 piece today, but no votes so far š Is there anywhere I should share it to get more visibility?
-
Regardless, it's a good meme theme
-
Yes it was a tongue in cheek comment
-
I donāt agree itās the new Freedom To Transact because FTT is a crypto wide ethos and statement of empowerment Subscribe & Chill is more like an Ad to get people to pay subs Thatās how I see it anyway
-
I heavily considering resubbing this card. I really like the message on my 1st one but, this one in full honesty makes kinda sense since this is a store front and purchases would be a memecard. I did it in a way that's it's educational. Also, parts of the meme just worked in unison with it as well (audio part me saying we gotta get some memes) open 24/7 storefront etc. IF I do decide to re submit the card will be called Subscribe and Chill 24/7. As we as a network are Open well 24/7. This was a click in my head and @[Cody] @[blocknoob] @[gpebbles] and a few friends were discussing this. This is the card. It's familar but, with a completly new message from my current submission
-
protecting the heart is what I see in the artwork and I think thatās very strong not all meme cards have such obvious links with the main themes. not all funny memes or boldly presenting common crypto terms an example you could look at on the heart is card 296 - BPM - Jake Andrew
-
Thatās actually really reassuring to hear, thank you. I think Iāve been overthinking the need to make the connection too explicitš¤š¦
-
-
Gmemeš¤š¦ Thinking about submitting this as my next card and wanted to hear your thoughts on it. The idea came from the ādonāt let the institutions steal your JPEGsā theme. I started thinking about how JPEGs stopped being just images a long time ago. They became emotional containers. Memories, identity, effort, wounds, pieces of ourselves. Thatās why the heart is outside the body in this piece. Vulnerable. Exposed. Held carefully while invisible systems try to pull at it. The title I have in mind is: āItās My JPEG, Itās My Heartā And the description: āThey say itās just a JPEG. But every JPEG contains something human inside it. A memory. A wound. A piece of the self. The institutions are not coming for the image. They are coming for the heart inside it. I wonāt let them steal it.ā Curious how this one lands with you all.
-
This is my favorite one of yours so far. It caught my attention immediately! I wonder if all the stuff about jpegs takes away from it though. The image reads as āwearing my heart on a sleeveā or being vulnerable.
-
Thank you, and yeah, I actually agree with you. I think itās stronger when the work can speak for itself and stay more universal. My only hesitation is that Iām submitting it specifically to the 6529 community, so part of me wonders if it still needs some connection to the JPEG/institutions themes to feel readable in that context. Iām a little afraid that if I keep it fully emotional and artistic, it might become too detached from the culture or harder to read as a Meme Card. Still figuring out where the balance is between universality and memetic context š¤š¦
-
What about calling it āFully Exposedā can be read in crypto and a human way?
-
Yeah, actually that was one of the layers I had in mind while making this piece, and I think āFully Exposedā could fit it really well. Thank you for the suggestion. Iāll probably go with this one for the piece š¤š¦
-
-
-
-
-
I made a meme artwork for 6529 ā can I share it publicly before submitting it? My REP still isnāt high enough yet šš
-
Hi
-
But that one would almost make me guilty to not subscribe
-
yes that one is funny, how would it look if that is actually a photo portrait?
-
i suggest this because of a very serious take i have about pure AI. And the stake is this one: All digital works made with pure AI age too quickly. A photo (since you are a photographer, right?) has a lot more age life.
-
I'm actually not a pro photographer, I take pictures with my phone, but what if I paint it. I do digital painting
-
I'd definitely be interested in seeing that concept with your own touch. Also from what I read in the Keys and Gates debate, there are many photographers who use their phones as cameras, so don't let that discourage you.
-
-
-
-
Maybe the typography needs to be better
-
Ok, is it the colour or font?
-
-
And this one, the idea is an 'oversabi' aunty that always tells you what to do. I thought the character will fit because they are always excited when they discover something, and can't wait to tell everyone.
-
This one is funny
-
@[gpebbles]
-
-
Tidied up the background, the focus is on the character and the CTA
-
There are quite a few things that catch my eye before subscribe and chill does
-
Alright, got it. I'll clean up the background
-
-
I'll appreciate any comments, thank you.
-
The second idea, more of a netflix and chill vibe
-
The first idea, taking a direct reference from a previous card
-
GM ā So I've been monitoring the Meme Foundry Dev clinic wave and I did a take on subscribe and chill and I'll love your feedbacks.
-
I think there's too much going on in the artwork
-
-
also you have 6m votes, a lot of people love it just the way it is
-
I love it too! only comment is that I expect 99% would be adding the gradient in here, like on the glasses shown here but, although a nice meme touch it probably is overused in memes generally
-
gradient glasses actually look pretty dope here. I definitely think the logo gets overused but this could be an exception. Thank you for the feedback
-
-
Just a minor detail perhaps related to the typography, the empty space between the upper sentences (the line spacing) should be slightly bigger
-
In other words, you have a pretty well-rounded piece of work here. I can only suggest that you expand upon it: that is, create more works in this same style. And make some memeable versions of this one; change the phrase, say other things that might make people laugh at different times.
-
The inverse of the colors gives it a 6529er vibe in a good way
-
All good just shitposting ready to be learned
-
damn that bad gotta call in the big guns eh :enjoyoor:
-
No But why not have the best person review it @[arsonic] is also good
-
-
@[6529er] Please help @[100series]
Loading more drops...