xTDH
Wave
TDH Name Vote
Generate Summary
Choose a timeframe to see summary coverage.
Drops
-
-
Vote over, Is this the official name now?
-
Spicy TDH
-
I have 1,000,000🌶️
-
🌶️
-
-
TDH = TOO DAMN HOT
-
now we're talking
-
🌶️ we'll use this emoji as the ticker so we don't have to write TDH
-
-
**Keep It Simple** - One descriptor is enough: Core TDH for Meme Cards and Gradients, TDH for everything else.
-
**Dashboard Transparency** - TDH should be shown per NFT (e.g., Cryptopunk #1234 TDH, Mfer #9876 TDH). This already makes it clear which TDH is stable and which is conditional, reducing the need for extra labels like xTDH.
-
Where would we see this? If you assign Cryptopunk #1234 TDH should it show up in your collected tab ones it's assigned TDH?
-
It would be shown in this UX that was mentioned in the Fluid TDH google doc punk shared.
-
-
-
**Definitions & Mechanics** - TDH: Total Days Held points accrued by NFTs through a TDH Rate. It goes away if the source Meme Card is sold or the assignment is removed. - Core TDH (currently called Base TDH): The purest form of TDH, earned directly from Meme Cards and Gradients. It goes away if those NFTs are sold or transferred.
-
This is nice!
-
-
**Exception: The Purest Form** - The only case that needs a distinct label is what we now call Base TDH, the purest form of TDH. It is earned directly from Meme Cards and Gradients and goes away only if those NFTs are sold or transferred. Personally I think Core TDH would be a better name. It feels stronger and less generic, and it also avoids unnecessary confusion with the Base chain
-
**Simplicity for the Majority** - In the long run there could be far more fluid TDH holders than base TDH holders. Maybe 5x, 10x, or even more. Remember it can be assigned to all NFTs, even outside of ETH. With that kind of scale, it makes sense to me that it should be simple for the majority to say they have **“TDH.”**
-
Why just TDH:
-
ok i'm going to give it one more pitch even though it's probably out of reach at this point.
-
I like my vote
-
but whatever
-
I'm on the biggest loser side 🤣
-
TDH Relay **?**
-
wow the gap has grown to almost 5x
-
one more suggestion .. **TDH Teleport** → zapped to another person
-
How about "Meme HODL Index" Meme HODL Index (MHI) → It connects directly to memes, resonates with the HODL culture, and works perfectly as an index that tracks the time you hold.
-
Spitballing here. SponsoredTDH? Or PatronedTDH? To show that it was gifted/assigned from someone using the original accruedTDH.
-
6529 does not like TDH proxy
-
but no one can vote or assign xTDH with proxyTDH afaik
-
where you let someone else give others REP on your behalf
-
proxyTDH TDHproxy I personally like xTDH but looking at the conversations from the past day, it seems like what we're talking is sort of a proxyTDH / TDHproxy - has some sort of a ring to it!!!
-
we already have proxyTDH
-
It’s proxy Rep but fine. I get what you mean
-
-
-
What does the X stand for? Just catching up…
-
@[punk6529] - is there a view here? If one keeps other collections in other wallets, would you want to incentivize those wallets be connected to the main wallets here?
-
That’s a very different use case. Not even sure how calculations will work in this case. Coz then it makes a new game of connecting wallets here on the main profile.
-
Sun's coming up and need to head out for a run. I'll circle back 👍🏾
-
so now the real MoMO is back we can all agree on xTDH finally
-
If you don’t have a different names For TDH, also the TDH calculations will look wrong. wen I look at my profile, I would want to know the TDH from my Memes and the xTDH that comes from other tokens.
-
You mean the additional TDH that comes from other tokens that you have in the same wallet connected on 6529 which are not memecards and have been given TDH by someone else (not yourself)?
-
I imagine the profile will need multiple TDH fields to account for where the TDH came from and where it went.
-
-
-
oooh, nice
-
Best way to test a thesis for sure
-
debate, not argue
-
Found a new bug @[GelatoGenesis]
-
I’m not sure i follow what the bug is? Excuse me the time is late :D
-
David edited the word 'argue' to 'debate' but the preview on my reply to him still showed unedited 'argue'
-
Aah. That’s a frontene thing. I think if someone edits something then frontend doesn’t update the reply previews what are already loaded into context. Perhaps @[simo] can do something about it tomorrow.
-
-
-
-
-
Poking holes is great
-
:)
-
I am more confident every time I debate with MoMO so that is good
-
It's okay
-
-
1000 explanations. 1 ticker = xTDH
-
consistency is key
-
and different API data for each
-
also there will be thousands of clients
-
It's almost like a saying True TDH = TDH + TDH v/s True TDH = TDH + 0.1 TDH You're representing 0.1 as x
-
no
-
"let's just call it TDH and then add labels on everything and explain it all"
-
clarity and transparency
-
not the same
-
if I hold 1M xTDH or 1M TDH it is not the same
-
So you’re differentiating to start with. You can very well say it the other way around and it will be the same. I hold 1.1M TDH of which 1M cannot move.
-
-
If it's going to have the same 'rights' They name doesn't matter. You can just tag it whatever and call it TDH
-
If TDH (as we know it today) and TDH we give out to communities is going to be a fraction that's loosely coupled and will have less power/influence in the network - It needs to have a different name
-
Why less power? Isn’t the understanding that it’s the same. e.g. you can very well decide to keep it to yourself and use full 110% power.
-
It's still 10% of the base TDH though
-
Yeah, so once you have the 10% added, you have your new TDH. 9% of that new TDH you can do whatever. And it can go wherever. Rest you can’t. Where is a new term needed in this? Or what is missing?
-
Who is controlling this account as of late. Person is not as smart as usual Momo.
-
-
-
-
-
thank you for your attention to this matter
-
you can show it however you want but I think it should have an identifier because it is unique
Loading more drops...