the purpose of the museum is to make the world's best decentralized museum, right?
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
19,717
matching drops
#1515387
2026-10-12 23:45
"why are you supporting the Picasso cabal and not emerging artists"
Probably some here would :-)
i mean, I consider these to be the most simple decisions we have to make, the lowest stake decisions we have to make and every time the last 2-3 weeks I have said this, there has been mostly static
yes i think we are all on board here right? i am going to go bump up my vote as well to get these rolling and stack some easy wins in our decision making
like if someone wants to give me a Picasso, I am not going to get out in the street and protest against them
the 50% of the mint is what pays for developers, AWS servers, tax accountants, etc etc and will continue to do so when decentralized
I feel like I probably missed some info on how its structured
is a completely different issue
if anyone is going to give to us or mint for it and so on
i am asking us to decide if we in principle would be in favor of a rare pepe or ringer or glyph being in the network collection
i want to separate out the issues
we will see
so @[punk6529] if part of your $100k donation to the cause is to go for rare naka.. perhaps sir shelby (if he is up for it!) can find the network one at a decent price
that considers it a blight on our collection?
is there someone here who is against having a glyph donated to us?
i mean is it controversial in any way whatsoever that if someone wants to give us an autoglyph we would take it?
what are "all the mints"
Im curious, why not use the funds generated by all the mints? Is there a particular reason for going the memecard route?
yes i agree it is more important but that is a financing questions
pepes is a must, actually is comming before both of the propositions rn imo
if X people want to mint Y ETH to finance it, why does this require any more consensus than those minting
what we should be doing right now is defining "what is in scope"
nobody is going to be forced to pay for anything for the museum
why? isn't it self-financing
right we are looking for a big consensus
for sure it is not just 1/1 photography that is in scope
but to say what is within scope
the purpose of these proposals is not to finance them or to make acquisitions
the same we anything else - donations, meme card accessions if they get voted on, other mints
how will these collections be financed?
that could be interesting - @[simo] bump to 40M
yes this feels right.. just maybe need like 40-50mil to clear which is usually what a winning meme card gets? either way no reason to slow these first proposals
we need to be on our way by end of the year
yes and it is appreciated. but now we need to step it up
looking forward to it sir.. the daemon has been using me for helping with mint counts and brining some enthusiams during the dog days we are in
there are no minimums for voting
very good
yes its ready and i JUST deployed it
voting is available to all
though I guess this is @[GelatoGenesis] too and how he did it in back end
@[simo] have have you done it? I agree we should be able to max up / down on each proposal
This is highlighting the proposal i made in QUORUM. I should be able to max vote on both imo.
so i will push more
but also we don't have the pace we should have
and it is ok, we have had some big wins, nice wins
I have seen ~1 year of me more laidback
the period of "bullying me for voting" is over
I will say this
I want to feel my way to what feels right
I do not think this is a network hard rule yet
we can adjust
let's figure it out
i dunno
first two proposals out for network museum and more to come. i am shilling for your vote
https://6529.io/waves/5f207393-5418-4a75-8738-e40edb44a94d
and customize button text accordingly
have an array of options
obviously it is no big deal to think through the various use cases
we are a decision-making network
these are important primitives for us
a wave where you vote on art and a wave where you vote on broad governance proposals are somehow different no?
obviously not, you should use a "variable"
This would be like so then in every voting wave. i guess its ok?