19,517 matching drops
#1510653 2026-10-11 21:49
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1103207 2026-06-17 14:57
there are multiple easier ways to have hacked the as of ysterday system
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1103206 2026-06-17 14:57
in any case, the broader scoring system would have been needed
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1103205 2026-06-17 14:57
it can have a good score through positive rep
Context from Zoku #1103186 2026-06-17 14:53
yes same, by his nature of anon it will never have a good score. i guess this is the answer you were asking punk ![Seize](https://d3lqz0a4bldqgf.cloudfront.net/drops/author_90bb8b3b-8780-47d6-b7cd-714139a36946/7df54b51-7aa6-4bbe-94fb-83b81149c33d/image.png)
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102621 2026-06-17 13:43
another iteration of this will come in an hour or two
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1102559 2026-06-17 13:35
it is just a reaction to one specific PR where this was a specific pattern to 1 PR, shipped a certain way, on a certain day, by me
Context from gpebbles #1102553 2026-06-17 13:35
interesting.. is this because still too much human in what i said? how can we all be most efficitive and valuable to the network and what you see being possible? what is the ambitious concept to understand and move towards?
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1102516 2026-06-17 13:30
not ambitious neough as a concept
Context from gpebbles #1102512 2026-06-17 13:30
you futureboss is powerful and can make these big changes happen.. and then it is on the users / humans to clean it all up around the edges to find the best way to present the info and navigate and use the site.. is this the future work flow in a sense?
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1102506 2026-06-17 13:28
what is the question?
Context from gpebbles #1102503 2026-06-17 13:28
so punk do you think this allows for much bigger things to happen such as a big change like this
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1102504 2026-06-17 13:28
i understand that @[simo] has reached for a bottle of vodka
Context from gpebbles #1102492 2026-06-17 13:27
yes this is why i had to ask them too for their experience seeing htis
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102490 2026-06-17 13:27
I was harassing @[simo] and @[GelatoGenesis] and @[prxt0] and @[ragne] that it was possible but I do not think they believed me until today
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1102487 2026-06-17 13:26
yes and now; have expected for a while and it was clear by beginning of year that it was possible (my 'wow' moment) and I have spent the last few months spending time and money to figure out how to do it
Context from gpebbles #1102473 2026-06-17 13:25
are you yourself a lil blown away by it.. even if you saw this coming for some time?
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102478 2026-06-17 13:25
quality of life improvement on displaying of our own NFTs in our waves
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102476 2026-06-17 13:25
https://6529.io/rememes/0xC4a27A38972A56Db6d719A4526D6E16Eb13CcC64/16
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102474 2026-06-17 13:25
https://6529.io/meme-lab/71
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102471 2026-06-17 13:25
https://6529.io/6529-gradient/0
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102470 2026-06-17 13:24
https://6529.io/nextgen/token/10000000986
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102469 2026-06-17 13:24
https://6529.io/the-memes/509
punk6529 maybe's dive bar Reply #1102467 2026-06-17 13:24
autonomously subject to my prompting
Context from gpebbles #1102462 2026-06-17 13:22
do not think we need scores for DMs.. but i know they are all waves as well so makes sense on v1.. and there is someting to not seeing the scores but it being understood with some visual thing and easily findable too
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102452 2026-06-17 13:20
page needs some graphic improvements but mansplainer here
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102450 2026-06-17 13:19
https://6529.io/discover/wave-score
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102443 2026-06-17 13:16
I think it is in a good direction
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102441 2026-06-17 13:16
It should be live now lets test and iterate
punk6529 maybe's dive bar #1102438 2026-06-17 13:16
so as you have seen, you asked for wave scoring, I have delivered wave scoring (you actually asked for rep, but the reality is wave scoring is a better approach to the problem because it takes into account multiple signals)
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1101126 2026-06-17 05:58
https://6529.io/rememes/0xC4a27A38972A56Db6d719A4526D6E16Eb13CcC64/26
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1101123 2026-06-17 05:58
https://6529.io/meme-lab/71
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1101120 2026-06-17 05:57
https://6529.io/6529-gradient/0
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1101116 2026-06-17 05:55
https://6529.io/nextgen/token/10000000221
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1101114 2026-06-17 05:55
https://6529.io/the-memes/509
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1100353 2026-06-16 20:41
https://6529.io/the-memes/509
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1100351 2026-06-16 20:40
https://6529.io/about/tech
punk6529 Memes-Chat #1098367 2026-06-16 08:20
minor quality of life issue: github links of all types make cleaner cards and profile pages on 6529 do also
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098358 2026-06-16 08:13
@[GelatoGenesis] a bit of cleanup/hardening: pls merge/deploy unless you have an issue https://github.com/6529-Collections/6529seize-backend/pull/1636
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098268 2026-06-16 07:02
https://6529.io/rememes/0x5f0780d4548409741ba6628bd461f93786d27d3c/1
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098267 2026-06-16 07:02
https://6529.io/meme-lab/71
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098266 2026-06-16 07:01
https://6529.io/nextgen/token/10000000514
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098265 2026-06-16 07:01
https://6529.io/6529-gradient/92
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098264 2026-06-16 07:01
ignore https://6529.io/the-memes/509
punk6529 Follow The Repo Reply #1098085 2026-06-16 05:48
yup this is fine
Context from simo #1098079 2026-06-16 05:46
yes, i go over i18n, doing pretty quick review and merging - looking bots comments - looking into code that it dont touch auth or other things whats not related Once i have merged small PR's into bigger i18n PR, then doing one bigger review
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098078 2026-06-16 05:44
I will work on a plan with you and we will run the rest of the site too
punk6529 Follow The Repo Reply #1098077 2026-06-16 05:44
if you are not going to touch auth/ipfs bc it is @[prxt0], I think you and @[ragne] getting up to speed on 18n and WCAG would be good and once we fix (if needed) and merge the outstanding ones
Context from simo #1098072 2026-06-16 05:40
gm, on it already
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098071 2026-06-16 05:39
there is no reason we can't do all of it
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098070 2026-06-16 05:39
so let's please follow this exact plan for today
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1098068 2026-06-16 05:39
5/ to make a small point, I deployed the updated github and profile cards, I sent it to deploy, test, iterate, along the way it had to patch something on the 1a staging branch, but as you can see the cards are live and looking good
punk6529 Follow The Repo Reply #1098067 2026-06-16 05:38
gm sunshines @[GelatoGenesis] @[prxt0] @[ragne] the priorities for you today are: 1/ review, test and if you agree ship the revised AUTH. It hardens first party approaches while leaving the community pathway open 2/ then same thing for the IPFS/Arweave centralized/common handling 3/ in an hour or two, I will also give you the wave scoring - i did it last night 4/ all the other tickets @[simo] are pretty straightforward. there is a lot of i18n and WCAG 2.2 AA ones. Obviously if I put it to merge, deploy, E2E test by itself, it would do just fine on those but I left them open so you and @[ragne] and @[prxt0] can see the approach. one small side question - I want by the end of the week the site to be accessible and localizable. It is a grindy task, but the llms are good at grinding, so we should let them lead and we supervise/monitor for errors
Context from simo #1098027 2026-06-16 05:14
gm keep grinding thru PR's. Focusing on getting speed up
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1096202 2026-06-15 18:48
on this note btw, please note the vastly more chic github cards that work for all types of github objects
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1096201 2026-06-15 18:47
and pushed, in fact, 555 PRs in repos where I just went ahead and merged
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1096199 2026-06-15 18:47
the only reason we don't have 555 PRs is that I turned my attention elsewhere until I saw what would happen here
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1096198 2026-06-15 18:47
there is no point to leave 60 PRs outstanding for 4 days for then the team to manually tell codex to automatically test them and then on day 5, we have 55 PRs outstanding
punk6529 Follow The Repo #1096196 2026-06-15 18:46
for the easy and medium ones, I already more or less know they are fine, with a bit harder testing, we can just let them merge and deploy