indeed, it is intereseting
Context from
Tharwin
#30626
2025-02-28 16:09
And another benefit is, I think, that many people would sleep better if they knew that their NFTs, besides being physically stored on one selected technology, are in another abstract layer connected to their multichain identity and theoretically can somehow survive teoretical the end of a chain and there is a back up plan, although far from ideal.
https://x.com/punk6529/status/1895505601146560959
at a very abstract level that is the logic
but we all actions more general
for security
and is the best NFT provenance chain too
so the general idea is we use the anchor on Ethereum which has the highest smart contract decentralized security
is it possible that a whole network state that is aggregation of individuals like me will only use one?
I, an individual, use multiple chains and decentralized services
I have an even simpler analysis
exactly!
Context from
Tharwin
#30608
2025-02-28 15:49
Identity is by nature multichain, NFTs are also on different chains, no one knows how technologically which chain will perform. That's why supporting "multichain" made a lot of sense to me.
I think we can do a better job @[teexels] @[DarrenSRS] on helping artists get set up appropriately
i think as we move the main discussions here instead of discord, it will happen better more naturally
Context from
ricodemus
#30574
2025-02-28 15:17
It could be either and I bet there are examples of both. Some artists have sold / given away their entire allotment and some have transferred to other wallets. I'm not sure if the team stresses the wallet consistency, but I'm pretty sure the artist determines the wallet where at least the mint funds are sent.
we need to focus on the the narrow case of we aiming to solve
there is not at all a global shortage of EVM or smart contract blockspace
I think this is the right answer
on the blockchain, I note there are various options but we are actually developing a specific one and that specific one is not a general purpose small contract platform in general or an EVM specifically but a very limited one to do what we need it to do
great! I am sure he will appreciate
Context from
Sert
#30591
2025-02-28 15:36
Yes I have some tools that can help him with summarization
this is @[maybe]'s isn't it?
Context from
Sert
#30583
2025-02-28 15:27
https://6529tldr.xyz
what is tltr?
this is a very interesting question. some people think we should do it EVM, I want to make it much more limited, special purpose. in any case, it is anchored to Ethereum via the NFTs
Context from
Sert
#30575
2025-02-28 15:17
Hey @[punk6529]
I'm catching up going back through all your messages (a lot to unpack). Quick question regarding your blockchain vision: are you planning to build it as an EVM-compatible chain, or do you envision it as a completely separate, standalone network independent from Ethereum? Just curious about your thinking on this.
one of two!
Context from
ReadyPereOne
#30573
2025-02-28 15:01
Quick question, if a meme card artist has zero TDH does this mean the artist doesn't even hold any of their own meme cards or it means the artist is connected to our platform with the wrong wallet setup (i assume is the latter)? And if it is the latter, can we ensure we onboard artists 'properly' when a new meme card artist is selected to mint a card - it's both a missed opportunity and not a good look on them
but the smart contract computational environment cannot access it
so it is very interesting in that all the data needed to calculate TDH is on-chain
you cannot calculate TDH within the Ethereum Virtual Machine!
here is a challenge though
good good struggling
cc @[simo] re last 2 notes above
not for core as it is now. it is just communicating via API to our central services. there is no more risk than having Discord or Whatsapp or Teams on your computer
once we go peer to peer, we will need to tighten it up a bit
Context from
johndoe8891
#30312
2025-02-27 17:14
Any more then usual security to put on the pc that's running it?
so I go back to my point from yesterday which is more precisely the following:
1/ I am OG decentralization maxi
2/ In light of #1, I want the nodes to be run-able outside a data center for maximum decentralization
3/ BTC is very trivially so and ETH also basically so. Solana not so much (for example)
4/ So this means we are designing a form of blockchain that can support this logic
5/ and separately but related to #4, I am going to set up my home network properly so I run it all properly at home so I can then write a guide of "how to set up your home network properly at home"
getting block rewards etc
the way it will work is that whoever is online at each block will be validating the block
keep in mind that this will change once we have a blockchain
Context from
RegularDad
#30307
2025-02-27 17:10
It doesn’t need to run 24/7, it just needs to be running when consesus it done with daily run. Otherwise it can’t be off. I’m rarely at my laptop wen it runs, so I usually miss it
welcome new posters in memes-chat
but all's well that ends well
a bit alarming at first
this one is really something
Context from
teexels
#30249
2025-02-27 15:01
Tomorrow
"The Cost of Permission"
@DianeeLindo
lol
Context from
MBStuart
#30173
2025-02-27 13:42
gmeme
but because they do not reside in my head
not because there is anything wrong with anyone else
bc it is very difficult for someone else to write it
so in the end it is going to be easier for me to write it one shot myself anyway
and that is mostly in my head and now to some degree the dev teams head
and to the protocol
but what happens is it inevitable starts veering towards the future
I asked @[MintFace] to work on some things
i tried
Context from
Vantekai
#30089
2025-02-27 11:48
I think everyone or as good as everyone currently here is working on the trust basis and isnt concerned. It just makes sense that for anything that keeps coming up to put on a FAQ page or similar , be that in whatever form you like and here or discord or wherever .
Reduces the questions with a side benefit of informing the silent non contributors who arent around at a particular time when things are discussed
Sure you could even commission a CM member to knock something up - ones who keep up with everything which most of us don't
it won't change the outcome of a vote
if research is voted by TDH
research is neutral
and on important things, a really good outcome would be museum is more "break glass in case of emergency"