over decades
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
20,678
matching drops
#1574220
2026-10-24 20:01
if you think about this at a broad level
i think we should maintain the pro decentralization theme, keep all the existing themes, be open to anything else and also open to science not just art - someone wants to put a scientific data set on chain
artists have a broad universe of ideas
we have 10 SZNs with a fairly tight set of guidelines
and see what appears
let's open it up
i would go the other way
hard to get 30+ good pieces on exactly one theme
maybe we want a whole szn to have a theme for example
what is the proposal?
GM again, I would like to retake the conversation that I shared last week about my proposal for extending the reach of the 6529 brand and ecosystem through IRL channels. Just to summarise, after the first two events were funded by the community, the next step would be to obtain external sponsors to co-host the next three Memes events and then explore the longer term roadmap that I summarised in my earliest posts.
While I personally believe in the potential value of this initiative and I'm ready to invest more time and money towards making this happen, I want to make sure that this initiative is aligned with your vision @[punk6529] and future roadmap - so for now, just a simple question, should I put this on hold until we get access to your upcoming whitepaper? Should we set a date to discuss this further once you have some time available without interfering with other urgent stuff being discussed here (I'll prepare a new summary of the decks I shared to make it easier to retake the conversations.
If my proposal is not aligned with your long term strategy, I have no problem at all dropping it and focus on other areas I could contribute that could be more aligned with your long term strategy, but I don't want to start talking to potential sponsors if you and/or the community don't think we should continue working on this or not in the way that I've shared and we need to change the angle.
Thanks!
why not 3 Nakas?
omg say 2 nakas!! @[Newlightvisuals]
are we going to do "click on notification takes you to the actual notification?"
good QOL improvements
thanks - nice!
shared in releases wave!
https://6529.io/my-stream?wave=05b14183-e153-4e47-bc66-42a0f49102d4&serialNo=33953
@[prxt0] have you shared the changes in notifications that I think are now live
you get rewards when you validate. you don't get them when you don't. it is that simple
I think it might be a bit tricky to implement and needs some considerations at the protocol level. We could consider fractions of TDH per minute/hour while online (without resetting when offline, since there could be various reasons someone might be offline for seconds/minutes/hours/days)
- just run a consensus node
- connect to it via CLI/API and do things
- run Core and a consensus node and connect your Core to your consensus node
- run Core and connect to someone else's consensus node
All the above are 'in protocol' and should be able to be done trust-free. then need to think more carefully re mobile and web which I think are outside of protocol and anyone can make them if they like
with this type of architecture, each of the following are possible:
and then separately what is currently called Core will be a client, but there could be others
consensus node will be written natively in Go
but it is more correct
it is a big project
this was the big thing we are taking on
and the big thing we are doing is separating the consensus logic into its own app, separate from the front-end logic
there will be a validator reward
I believe that, in general, a reward should exist. The 'type' of incentive greatly depends on the chain’s structure. The 6529chain won't be based on proof of work or ETH proof of stake (proof of ownership?)
But how many users will actually run their own nodes? Currently, even just a few dozen nodes might be enough to secure a network with only a few hundred active users, but at scale, we’ll need thousands of validator nodes. For comparison, Bitcoin currently has around 21,000 reachable full nodes; many of these are miners, others serve business needs, etc. I’d say only about 10% run nodes without any practical incentive.
If we aim for a large, secure, and decentralized 6529 network capable of scaling to hundreds of millions of people, we’ll need incentives to encourage thousands of Cores. The drawbacks of running a Core (time spent downloading transactions, keeping the PC online 24/7 or pay for aws, etc.) must be balanced.
All network functionalities (Brain, tools, etc.) will works better on a full Core, but I imagine these will also be usable by ‘lightweight clients’ (web app desktop & mobile) who fetch real-time information from public full Cores.
i will think about what my views are
i had not considered this scenario before
ah, I see
I think the question is about adding an escrow wallet to the Memes Contract so that people can lend and borrow against their meme cards without losing TDH
Maybe TDH accumulation is paused while in escrow, but you dont lose any
Once it comes back to your wallet you start accumulating again
oh can we see it?
Yep - @[Newlightvisuals] made it for one of Pere's big Memes parties
wait this exists?
I think @[ReadyPereOne] and @[4lteredBeast] beast did this with up to SZN 10
"good artists copy. great artists steal"

long time
https://x.com/Satflow_/status/1899638915025555693
that's all? great!
Send one Naka to newlightvisual.eth
i don't understand what you are asking!
@[punk6529] since you've thought about this for at least 42 min, i'm really having difficulty breaking TDH... here are my thoughts:
lending borrowing facilities break the letter of the law but not the spirit of TDH because borrowers specifically do not want to lose TDH thus borrow against instead of sell
should they default, they lose TDH as ordained by the 69 decentralized gods
would be sociologically fascinating to use rep as the collateralized threat here but i'd hate to see someone lending decent size against a naka learn the hard way reputation in fact has a price
how bad of an idea is it for the community to decentrally decide that lending/borrowing is a reasonable economic activity that is worthy of having one (or more) TDH-cheat wallet(s)?
The idea is, if card is sent to particular wallet address (smart contract), TDH pauses for the time it's in that wallet. if it returns to the borrower wallet, TDH resumes. if it leaves to lender wallet, all tdh is lost as usual.
payment not bounty. bounties are tricky because lots of people do the work and then only one gets paid and it is kindof weird like that
(needs a bounty @[punk6529])
great! do you have time this week?
Ser I would absolutely love to work with you on this. Video production is my main thing.
tomorrow
i think a batch of notifications QoL improvements coming toorrow
THISSSS!!!!!
etc
the artists
all the cards
I would like to drop a SZN1 to SZN10 video
once we wrap SZN10
anyone here with good video skills and some time this week?
https://x.com/adcock_brett/status/1899544574626070660
you can feel @[6529er] fear coming through the post
Blue chip right there
decades of practice to allow me to do that
Love the way you mixed the black and blue line real talent :)
see you in court!
in other news i got a new pfp today
need to save it for Stream, to mint as a 1/1 to break Beeple's records
CT is going to lose their mind when this makes every top 10 contemporary art list that exists
wen MoMA?
