i think for now in our current structure is you should receive half the funds (if you make a meme that is voted onto the island) and then you can do whatever you want with it. if you want to 'refund' half the minters, go ahead. if you want to give it to charity, go ahead. if you want to spend it all on champagne, also fine
Context from
RegularDad
#36112
2025-03-14 15:52
some questions sparked by this meme. It should in someway be part of the Memes. It is Meme lore and awesome. What are the thoughts about this.
1. probably can’t/shouldnt mint someone else’s selfy, even in a decentralized world
2. Say I made an illustrated version of it, submitted it as a Meme card, and was selected by community. Could I say, I don’t want any funds for it and have the mint be half priced with all going to 6529 Team? That might be a bad precedent. might need to instead have a plan on how to use the funds (thinking aloud here)
like everything in life, once one commits, things happen. for several months I was half-assing it between here and Discord and the reality is both of them got kindof crappy. once I said this is it, I am here only, I am not dual posting to Discord, not even for important things, we are starting to get some traction and vibe in here
Context from
crunch
#36030
2025-03-14 10:41
was thinking .... would people voluntarily *leave* the discord server .. don't go back to check it ... just stay focused on chat here - if people get left behind ... they will eventually figure out where we are
correct
Context from
RegularDad
#36052
2025-03-14 12:29
Caught up on that night chat about “Bribing“. I think mfers do what they want, but it could be hard/expensive to bribe enough to be successful in an engaged decentralized system. Even if someone bribed Ruskin with his 10 million TDH, the network could reverse the bribe with just 5-10 people in the top 150 TDH…. That isn’t even including potential use cases by Museum or 6529research.
I doubt one would get banned. Rep and decentralized responses will be the answer to undesirable behaviors
yeah i don' t think we should mint pictures of humans without permission. if we do animated / illustrated version, realistically it should be actual public figures, not individuals
Context from
RegularDad
#36112
2025-03-14 15:52
some questions sparked by this meme. It should in someway be part of the Memes. It is Meme lore and awesome. What are the thoughts about this.
1. probably can’t/shouldnt mint someone else’s selfy, even in a decentralized world
2. Say I made an illustrated version of it, submitted it as a Meme card, and was selected by community. Could I say, I don’t want any funds for it and have the mint be half priced with all going to 6529 Team? That might be a bad precedent. might need to instead have a plan on how to use the funds (thinking aloud here)
i like this one
Context from
Sonia
#36125
2025-03-14 16:28
For those who don't know, @[AnaNovo] is the artist behind @[TheMeans] including our most recent drop, "Everything is Computer".
She has her own collections and work which I highly recommend checking out. Give her a follow, will yas? :)
also last thing: Scottie and I have won an average of 3 NBA Championships
scottie and i and satoshi played on the 76ers in 1993
Context from
hexum
#35378
2025-03-13 22:59
Punk is an alien and another alien revealed his identity to me a few years back. The hoodie punk instead of alien cryptopunk is just to throw us off
(Punk may not be Scottie pippen but I am auditioning to be the Scottie pippen of the 6529 protocol so I can say insane things like I met satoshi in 1993 and he speaks to me in visions)
since he is currently in solitary for his unauthorized Tucker interview, and I am here chatting, we can safely rule him out :)
Context from
david
#35375
2025-03-13 22:54
SBF lol
I can confirm that I have never won an NBA Championship as a player or as a coach
it won't be like "no way, I can't believe punk6529 is actually Scottie Pippen"
etc etc etc
same actions
with exactly the same ideas
the doxxed me and pseudo me are exactly the same person
if one finds out who i am, i assure you will be 0.00000% surprised
and i have no real other reason than security to stay pseudo
on #1/, this does not matter anymore, i got what i needed to know
that is done
i can't imagine i am going to go to cheesey linkedin photo
i am always going to rock the pfp
2/ the second is security
also i had seen gmoney and 4156 rocking a pfp and was like oh that seems fun lets try it
so that was interesting but that part is done, i know the answer
like within 2 months of punk6529 naval invited me over and i was like well i am kindof not close but anyway lets do a zoom and i turned on the camera and he was like wtf it is you?!
1/ to see if my ideas were any good re NFTs. I have some credibility in crypto pre-6529 so I di did not want to bias the signal back to me, so i went to start with the 0 follower egg and see what happened and it was very funny bc very soon my crypto friends naval and balaji and so on started following me again without knowing it was me
i was anon for two reasons
even if 1/1000 are problematic that is still 500 people
anyway right now i don't think there is any particular upside for 485K people on twitter to know exactly who i am
are sometimes unavailable
so the type of solutions that might work with smart people
the security one is tricky because most criminals are in fact morons
Context from
Articulate
#35350
2025-03-13 22:44
First solve for "problems smart people have they don't realise yet"
Then solve for "problems morons might invent that are not real"
Damn. That's a heavy to-do list!
nobody is going to beat me up until I give them a rock from the moon because very obviously even to morons i do not have a way to go the moon tonight to get them a rock
proof of timelock
Context from
david
#35346
2025-03-13 22:43
proof of security
like what happened to the ledger co-founder
but i have not solved the part of ensuring some moron does not cut my finger off
it is very frustrating because i have fully solved the part that I can't, in fact, transfer the goose
that it is very obvious that I can't transfer the goose
it has to be solved on the positive side
so it has to be solved again with Technology That Does Not Yet Exist But I Think It Should Because I Have Problems That Other People Don't Realize Yet (tm)
which you can't
bc in this form, it is trying to prove a negative
is how i can prove this to them so they don't rip my fingernails out
the part that is not solved
nobody can break into my house and steal the goose
from a technical side the security is solved
my primary concern is reducing security risks
Context from
david
#35332
2025-03-13 22:37
do you want to remain anon forever or just for the forseeable future?
who knows
but who will read this chat in the future
to be clear not that i am worried about any of you
so for now I have avoided discussing any family stuff for i guess security reasons so as much as I would like to chat more openly for now i won't
Context from
david
#35324
2025-03-13 22:34
btw do you have kids?