if every person with $60M or higher net worth wants just 1 meme card, there are not enough to go around ;)
Context from
Juicy
#38115
2025-03-16 22:06
Maybe from the future perspective, but for current market it's a very large supply :P
i know, barely any when you think about it ;)
Context from
Juicy
#38097
2025-03-16 22:01
There are 158,000 memecards though
if we get through all of this simultaneously
- SZN11/12 working well
- WP
- Blockchain working
- Me discussing it more extensively
- world not ending
I think then we will start having more real world feedback. for now it is anyway just us
patience still warranted
yes we are reading into small numbers right now
Context from
intrepid
#38090
2025-03-16 22:00
I would not read to much into it ; people have been brutalised this past 18 months in nfts and happy to take a small win. They are not playing the same game as the holders who believe in the decentralised network state
@[Vantekai] this could be a TDH breakeven tool - "how long before I earn back my TDH"
Context from
Shelby
#37971
2025-03-16 21:00
Think I made a decent decision on TDH. I had 538 TDH between 3 cards, x2 copepe ed 2008 + Digital Rights ed 1008, sold all three and bought I become meme ed 397. should be able to make up TDH reasonably quickly?
the AI tools now can saturate my I/O
i need more I/O
no, learning things
Context from
david
#38067
2025-03-16 21:55
Editing the white paper?
this was always a goal that i held myself to. whether we think of the way to do our great social experiment together or not, I wanted the collection to stand alone regardless as a collection and both the substance and the messaging reflected that
Context from
VegasGuy
#37741
2025-03-16 16:04
Sure we all want to make money and there's ground-breaking technology, etc. All true. But at the end of the day I think many of us got involved because we enjoyed the collecting experience.
delicious
Context from
Vantekai
#37821
2025-03-16 18:59
Sorry team stats on leave
Sunday afternoon footy ....

i was in a Deep Research cave for the last few hours and I look up and was like "oh"
oh man
Context from
GhostPepper
#38052
2025-03-16 21:51
I had all missing pieces to make a second szn 2 set in my card in the OS cart and seconds later half of them disappeared because it was right when the sweep to .065 happened.
under all normal outcomes we are going to get some non-stupid pathway / sandbox for crypto this admin
give hester a few more months and she will give you a sandbox and then you can do your securities without getting in trouble :)
Context from
maybe
#38041
2025-03-16 21:47
All my best ideas have one fatal flaw each
wow @[DGMD] just went and looked
nice to see you back
Context from
mememaxis
#38033
2025-03-16 21:44
I love Punku everyday haha
probably not
Context from
maybe
#38027
2025-03-16 21:43
@[punk6529] can we offer meme card securities in szn11?
Ruskin is a gigachad
Context from
RegularDad
#37853
2025-03-16 19:24
The crazy thing is that even with all those buys, @[DGMD] still has about half the cards of @[Ruskin].
It really highlights how little liquidity there is and how amazing of a collector Ruskin has been.
bingo
Context from
mingt
#37975
2025-03-16 21:04
This is a social experiment
yo
Context from
mememaxis
#38016
2025-03-16 21:42
Gmeme all
wow, inefficient!
Context from
VegasGuy
#37968
2025-03-16 21:00
Someone put up a bid wall of .06529 on all cards for hundreds of them. Seems sort of inevitable people would dump cheap cards into the bids
gm
Context from
lake
#38012
2025-03-16 21:41
gm ser
@[simo] scrolling is generally better. sometimes (no idea when) after I reply and get in the right place (bottom) and I try to scroll up again, it rejects my scroll up 3 times (e.g. I start scrolling and it bounces me back down) and then it works. it is weird but it has happened enough times that I think it is real
patience!
Context from
AnimatedNFT
#38007
2025-03-16 21:38
Demand from a handful of people doesn’t mean demand to mint out cards. Perhaps I shouldn’t be as confident but i think we have a long way to go before everyone is giddy to mint new cards
data is both onchain and on ipfs
Context from
EzMonet
#37414
2025-03-16 00:41
Each of the 100 pieces is represented as a 100% on-chain SVG with a secondary IPFS link.
let's fix this @[brookr]
Context from
intrepid
#37581
2025-03-16 04:52
This is not for Brain ; but for the Delegations via SAFE faq ; It says "
1. Connect with your "Safe Wallet" here and go to the Transaction Builder app."
I read this as connect ‘here’ as in 6529.io, as there is no underline or bold on the link in the FAQ (at least in dark mode) and you don’t connect with your safe wallet to the SAFE site you connect with the signing wallets. So I spent a lot of time trying to connect the safe wallet to 6529 using wallet connect which does not work. If you could please make it explicit and say connect to the SAFE site or connect ‘to your’ SAFE wallet on the SAFE site ‘here’ . Might save someone else the confusion.
i can't believe you did a whole interview with @[BatSoupYum] and did not ask him about his inordinate love of penis-shaped NFTs.
Context from
0xCuttlefish
#37191
2025-03-15 15:23
Gmeme and happy weekend frens! Check out the interview below with @[BatSoupYum] for some great insights on NFTs and decentralization, and good advice for separating signal from noise on CT.
https://x.com/6529Gradientz/status/1900928377101406405
in principle yes. we need more activities first. i think this comes later
Context from
EzMonet
#37195
2025-03-15 15:39
I wonder in order to pull in NFT holders into 6529/Memes network if owners of certain rare NFTs (punks/squiggles etc) could received a set amount of Rep. (punk holder etc) to help with Level gated initiatives... for that matter could we also do that same thing for fungible token holders (BTC Holder etc)...idk just thinking out loud. i know there is some rep given for some of these holders already
not fixable. if the majority of any group wants to commit suicide they can
Context from
golden618
#37190
2025-03-15 15:22
Hi, @[punk6529]. Thinking it over a bit on the the core BTC security assumption you noted the other day: “you collude with 50% to fuck the chain, you can do that but then you fuck yourself because price will collapse”. IMHO, there is a serious flaw in this assumption: rationality. It relies on the Rational minds of the players who will seek optimal utility and avoid ruins. Since TDH security follows BTC, this flaw will carry over to TDH as well. If we learned anything from human history and experiences, it is anything but rational. When love turns to hate, mutual destructions ensured that lead to murder-suicide. “If I cannot have it, I will destroy it so that you cannot have it.” We have already seen quite a few examples where a beloved King turns murderous and destroys an empire he builds. So as a decentralization maxi, what is your design and thinking to avoid this human trait of irrationality?
yes this is the long-term solution.
Context from
purchardus
#37265
2025-03-15 19:07
would there be a way for any person could flag a submission for things like hardcore porn, gore, extreme violence, etc etc, and then it could be expedited for a rapid review by some larger committee?
yes correct
Context from
purchardus
#37255
2025-03-15 19:00
season 11 sounds so fun. it's almost like the opposite of rodeo. we want to try our best as a group to curate a collection of the best memes from the essentially limitless amount of art/nfts that can get minted
will share more things like this
Context from
ReadyPereOne
#37271
2025-03-15 19:42
GM fam! The shared google doc for SZN11 is like the famous Excel sheet from SZN1...not saying this needs to be onchain too like the tweetstorms, but love to see this 'raw luxe' style in building each phase of this journey, gonna dig into it right now!
this is why we don't let grandpa touch the servers
Context from
RegularDad
#37316
2025-03-15 22:23
Nothing! Bats made it sound like it won’t be possible to do quickly
correct
Context from
6529Guardian
#37314
2025-03-15 22:22
enjoyoooors can still just subscribe while others are doing "the other stuff"
we will get it done
this is more work than doing the antisniping
Context from
RegularDad
#37272
2025-03-15 19:57
Another possible antisniping option if the 6529 plan can’t be don’t fast enough
weekly rank lists that close early, on say Fri
Sat is a runoff with say the top 6 or so on the list to be able to weed out any snipers
Top 3 after 24 hrs are the Memes for the week.
it is just math
what is wrong with doing anti-snipping protection now?
Context from
RegularDad
#37269
2025-03-15 19:18
I would prefer to wait another season for anti-sniping protection than another rehash of a pseudo-decentralized curated collection.
there is no problem with daily adjustment for active participants. the purpose of the continuous leaderboard is that it is the most efficient way to do it. you can't ask people to repopulate / repost / revote 3x a week
Context from
RegularDad
#37285
2025-03-15 20:34
The continuous leaderboard is nice in that it allows for less active daily management by users In creating their lists. I could see myself or other Meme cultists adjusting the list daily to vote up their favorite Meme in the top 5. Their is a lot of gray between sniping and active participation
post is just a post like all social media. drop is a submission to a specific votable proposition
Context from
Tharwin
#37291
2025-03-15 20:52
The post is just text and the drop can be voted on.
we have to do it community based
no board
Context from
BatSoupYum
#37257
2025-03-15 19:00
One possible solution to the issues brought up around spam in the doc above: You can keep it fully decentralized by having the community Rep a SZN 11 curatorial board. That board (maybe 10 members) then have the power to decide on what makes it in/out
Obviously can change again for SZN 12, etc
people vastly underestimate what it means to really decentralize anything more complex than basic transaction processing.
here is something that looks trivial on the surface the minimum needed for it to work is "everything we have done so far" including TDH + all the tools + the Google doc
Context from
ReadyPereOne
#37274
2025-03-15 20:19
Great doc, amazing how much detail needed to decentralize something that had achieved the maximum level of UX simplicity for top card collectors :-)
not the purpose of this document - need to confirm the mechanics so dev team can deliver it
Context from
Articulate
#37303
2025-03-15 22:07
I like it too
the missing bit is the “culture”
We, collectively, have to hold onto what we have here to keep it a welcoming space for artists even while we assertively select the best from our perspectives
@[prxt0] I think what is being requested is a parameter like [filter out <x]
Context from
Vantekai
#37177
2025-03-15 14:15
@[prxt0]
I have now fixed on my site (I think)
However
1: Its a botch job and may yet come to light some unforeseen consequence somewhere else ha ah. So im not doing a victory dance yet...
2: Maybe cool to tweak the api for when others other than me use this endpoint which I guess in time could be quite a popular ones as has all headline info for each token
Cheers
here is my view of how, mechanically, we can implement SZN11
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QRo7kRWGRFc6kRM9tEji2AEP4hwDVMAXTkZqXVa86aA/edit?usp=sharing
@[simo] @[prxt0] @[teexels] @[GelatoGenesis] @[ragne] @[6529er] @[DarrenSRS] in particular, please read carefully, we should aim to have it locked by EOD tomorrow so we can impleement
comments are turned on for all, feel free to share any suggestions
well pebbles has a bit of this
Context from
crunch
#37142
2025-03-15 12:24
I like this. I've thought about a gen art collection where the traits are determined by number of cards held / tdh
exactly!
Context from
Articulate
#37136
2025-03-15 12:00
Love that
Once the text is on-chain it could actually be anything
Would love to see @[baiwei] have a go at it - and lots of others here too
basically making the threads traits