Oceans of Wisdom

compliance has entered the chat

ASI

2027

yeah

if it all works, etc, etc it won't stop at 100M, sure but also i think line between AI and humans will blur

encryption will need to be swapped out

ASI for sure

roger that

what do you mean links

@[prxt0]

EOY

btw AGI this year still seems on track

really lots of skulls going on there

its a good one

maybe easiest to have 1 medium sized warning type only?

still cracking up about this. "you have to wait 3 days to change your name and PFP again"

web sockets will take care of this

or raffle is only 11

edition is only 11?

yup

@[prxt0] - note that david failed to change his name too

we will fix tomorrow

that is for sure a bug

but the PFP thing is amusing

that is the right way

once we do that

it should be much better

it will go to web sockets

i gave the green light to do it correctly even though i am not yet sure how to translate that later to decentralized

as i mentioned earlier

look on scrolling

i wonder if we got one @[itsjpower]?

fuck amazing

amazing, we have implemented annoying twitter pfp technology without even trying @[simo] @[prxt0] check this out we have turned david's pfp to black. it should be this 

i am not ready for vitalik

later, later

yes

wait is your PFP not supposed to be black?

fewer in practice

@[simo] second report. bored, what browser are you using?

just realized we need a Masa card. have no idea what that means but putting it out into the universe. he is a very interesting person.

that is not what is driving the market behavior is what I am saying

impressive

that is not what is happening

"Asian whales are buying"

peer pressure is really something

just wait until every person in China wants one ser

yeah of course

omg it has happened

"**A plausible estimate for the 158,000th richest person in the world would be on the order of $60–$70 million in net worth.**" **Estimating the net worth of the world’s 158,000th wealthiest individual** is inherently imprecise because no major wealth-ranking publication (e.g., Forbes, Bloomberg, Credit Suisse, Knight Frank) publicly tracks and lists individual net worths that far down. However, we can approximate by combining publicly reported data on “ultra high net worth” (UHNW) populations with known wealth distribution patterns. ## 1. Key data points on UHNW individuals Several wealth reports break down the global population of ultra high net worth individuals—generally defined as those with **$30 million or more** in net worth. Two frequently cited sources are: 1. **Knight Frank Wealth Report** - Recent editions estimate the number of people worth $30 million+ (UHNW) at around **600,000–650,000** worldwide (this figure has grown steadily over the last decade). 2. **Credit Suisse Global Wealth Report** - Tracks broader millionaire populations and their distribution. While it may not give a direct breakdown at exactly $30 million, it often aligns with Knight Frank’s magnitude. From these data: - If there are roughly **600,000+** people with $30 million or more, that means the “poorest” person in that group—the ~600,000th richest individual—has close to $30 million. - The 158,000th richest person is well above that cutoff, because they rank in the top 158,000 (i.e., significantly “richer” than the 600,000th). ## 2. Looking at higher wealth brackets Reports also discuss counts of individuals at **$50 million+, $100 million+, and $500 million+**: - **$100 million+ (often called “centimillionaires”)**: Various estimates put their global population around **30,000–40,000**. - If you are in the top 30,000 or 40,000, you likely have $100 million or more. - Thus, the **158,000th** richest person is definitely below $100 million because that rank is worse (i.e., lower wealth) than the 30,000–40,000 range for centimillionaires. - **$50 million+**: Some estimates place this population around **200,000–250,000** worldwide. - If so, the 158,000th richest person is *within* the top 200,000, meaning they are at least in that $50 million zone or higher. Putting these brackets together: - 600,000th richest = about $30 million - ~200,000th richest = about $50 million - ~30,000–40,000th richest = about $100 million Hence, **the 158,000th richest** is very likely **above $50 million but below $100 million**. ## 3. A reasoned ballpark figure Because wealth distribution at the very top is extremely skewed (a power-law distribution), the difference between, say, the 200,000th and the 100,000th can be tens of millions. A reasonable midpoint for the 158,000th might be somewhere in the **$60–$70 million range**. It’s certainly possible that the 158,000th wealthiest person could have a net worth a bit lower or higher—no single published source is that granular. But based on the major wealth reports: > **A plausible estimate for the 158,000th richest person in the world would be on the order of $60–$70 million in net worth.** ### Why it’s just an approximation 1. **No exact ranking**: Forbes and Bloomberg track only a few thousand billionaires and (in some cases) multi-centimillionaires. Detailed data beyond those top few thousand is limited. 2. **Varying methodologies**: Different institutions define and estimate wealth differently (some include primary residences, others exclude them; some rely on bank/private wealth data, others on national household wealth surveys). 3. **Rapid changes**: Asset values (stocks, real estate, crypto, private equity stakes, etc.) fluctuate, so “snapshot” wealth data can change quickly. Therefore, while we cannot pinpoint a precise dollar figure, using Knight Frank and other UHNW data strongly suggests **tens of millions** of dollars—most likely in the **$60–$70 million** bracket—for someone ranked ~158,000th in global wealth.