is tactics
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
20,678
matching drops
#1574220
2026-10-24 20:01
to how we might do it later
everything else from how we are doing it now
an oracle for decisions
that is its whole purpose
lol
the whole system is an oracle tbh
and they have tradeoffs
there are many different ways to go about it
the details have to do with things like oracles, bridges, etc
the general structure for me is clear
it actually solves quite a few other problems as well
then it can be used to pay for gas, etc
sure, if TDH is hashing power and increases over time (increases security) than fungible is the fungible coin, it should have a capped supply but mined over time (not airdropped). the block rewards from the fungible token are what encourages economically people to validate
:)
still huge
9 / 46 actually
that is huge
20%
9 / 45
how much of the network do you control
you bought no cards
and the for year 2 to year 10
assume you bought all the year 1 cards
so let's go the other way
so 1/46 or about 2%
and year 10 rolls around and adds 1 more year worth of TDH
so 9 + 8 + 7 + 6 +5 + 4 +3 + 2 +1 = 45
Year 9 x 1 = 1
Year 8 x 2 = 2
Year 7 x 3 = 3
Year 6 x 4 = 4
Year 1 x 9= 9
Year 2 x 8 = 8
Year 3 x 7 = 7
Year 4 x 6 = 6
Year 5 x 5 = 5
at end of year ten, how much TDH is there
so let's do year 10
the key thing to understand is there is a fixed amount of new TDH creation capacity created every year
because meme cards are sold and TDH is destroyed
once we understand it this way, we know that in real life the inflation is even lower
let's do the math and the reasoning as if every meme card is bought and no meme cards are ever sold
but let's ignore them for now because they make the math and the reasoning harder
sales obviously make inflation lower
the easiest way to reason about this is to ignore sales
the network TDH is not growing as a square annually
i am not sure I agree with your math
Thank you for the replies @[punk6529] and I agree with you. I was viewing it from a different angle and I used "inflation" loosely. The angle I viewed is this: if an investor buys (or owns) a fixed fraction of the network TDH today (say 1%), HODL and doesn't participate in the future seasons, how does his/her share of the network TDH decrease over time T? My answer is 1/T, as the total network TDH increases as T^2 while the investor's TDH increases only linearly with T. So it will half in 2 years, and drop to 10% in 10 years, due to the "inflation" of the network TDH.
no, not at all. people can own 6529 for the normal reasons they own a network token
What about TDH calculated over fungible tokens? Wouldn't it make sense to calculate it from $6529? Or is it an unnecessary inflation factor? Again, for someone, owning pure $6529 instead of NFT might be more comfortable.
correct. the order is the other way
There is no way that $6529 could generate TDH as a fungible token
no there is nothing SZN specific to this discussion
gm team
I find inflation counterintuitive and not my strong point
I’d love if someone can explain how Szn2 holders are affected? That’s not me but it’s an interesting example where supply increased significantly during Szn2 (TDH per card dropped sharply)
they already think I am crazy with the JPGs so it is fine
Thinking punk is going to take a beating from his bitcoin maxi friends when the WP comes out regardless how good it is ):
dunno if it is @[GelatoGenesis] will know
Oh interesting if it’s in the api I’ll add it
"who has the most fungible coins at a single point in time" is a much weaker metric
yes
I was thinking about early/founder power of TDH. The ”institutional knowledge“ gained through time is a valuable asset, particularly In a job or project lIke this. TDH captures that in a way few things can