but better to let them figure it out first
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
20,678
matching drops
#1574220
2026-10-24 20:01
that will help maybe
there is some new stuff coming down the line on BTC multi-sigs
I do not want to think about it right now bc I am running out of available processors
BTC is a headache
I think the issue is basically solved there
you add Solana too
more complexity etc
yet another thing to manage
still would not deploy unless there are users though
berachain is EVM
lol true
berachain is EVM
and then all the EVM compatible L1s
that is where all our NFTs are
we have to do mainnet
that gives you mainnet and all the L2s
We first do EVM
should this happy state of affairs happen where both berachain and 6529 have 1000x more users than they have now, we are Gucci
because they imply that: we have enough users and berachain has enough users that there is a joint overlap of 6529/berachain users that want this
but I think these are far luxury problems
then maybe Berachain will fund their wallet development
assuming everything goes well, etc, etc, etc
isn't ETH and SOL going to cover 95% of it right now?
I guess the main app could have limited chains it interacts with and other clients can be built that allow other chains to be supported
(very nicely formatted)
bc they effectively are nicely formatted block explorers
clients (what we call core right now) update automatically
e.g. this wave just voted to give @[maybe] -69 rep bc of poor customer service at his Meme Exchange
so they just trigger internal things
most blocks are internal
that is validated
so you get a block every I dunno 2 minutes or whatever
so internal to 6529 blockchain issues are "easy" - validate by TDH vote, block rewards, transaction rewards, you trust TDH, consensus method is TDH, etc, etc
i mean it does not cost more than if it was 1, right?
so if there are 1000 ethereum transactions the cost is split 1000 ways?
this is a good graphical representation of the last 12 months
and trusted in many ways
I am basically trusting 2-3 chainlink operators with the root value of the network, no way
and one of the things that dragged me where was when I dug into how we could use chainlink to oracle TDH on-chain
and trusted in many ways
centralized
chainlink is quite centralize
if they want to but this overlaps in some ways with chainlink
so basically any chainlink node operator could just setup a 6529 profile and they could have REP together and submit data through 6529 to Ethereum or anywhere
i think it should be end-user triggered
Skip some block?
do we need to pay gas on Tezos to tell Tezos what we are up to, "not on Tezos"
if it does not impact state on Tezos
I don't see why not
can we skip posting it on Sol and Tezos?
Let's say 123457 had an ETH tx
I don't see why not
could we skip posting it on ETH?
but let's say block 123456 was just 6529 blockchain transactions
right, the network is just putting a hash from each block onchain
seems like wasted resources that somehow the network will pay for
is there any point in posting merkle roots for all of them on both ETH and SOL