nfts are not art
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
20,678
matching drops
#1574220
2026-10-24 20:01
urban art wasn't art
pop art wasn't art
impressionism wasn't art
ofc this always happens
within a specific framework of "What It Means To Be An Artists (tm)"
but it is all a very specific type of conventional openness
I had this vague idea that they were weighted towards openness
just how boomers artists are on average
I did not realize that until a few years ago
Artists:
a) hate AI!
b) hate NFTs that will save them for AI
imagine! maybe NFTs have a point after all in the world of AI!
Oh darn! Only if the generated images were NFTs, they would have easily figured out which ones were real and which ones were created by AI lol.
330
Do we know edition size for arsonic card yet?
"Banish to the shadowlands" will be our next easy button - @[simo]
I really like having the follow option so easily accessible. Doesn’t seem like the unfollow needs to be as easy to (accidentally) click though
I wouldn't be mad at him
let's just say if sama wanted to promote the memes to 400M people at no cost to me
while the combined value of our all cutesy family photos ghiblified images is $0
and $x,xxx,xxx + in the future
and is there any doubt if there were original 1/1 SG Ghibli NFTs they would go $xxx,xxxx now
only SG can drop SG NFTs and I dunno plush dolls
the trademark protects you there
drop movie, merch, NFTs
I just got a few billions of dollars of free publicity
I would be ecstatic
if I was running SG
or are @[arsonic] NFTs more valuable bc SGT Pepe has been around the NFT space
is @[arsonic] being abused by anyone because of this
every single 6529 NFT has renounced its copyright claims right?
the interview was not about this was it? it was about some really creepy old fashioned "AI' stuff
This has me two-sided! I started the thought with Ghibli should be happy because his kind of work is being shown to everyone across the world and hopefully his studio gets more clients/revenue from all this publicity.
But then reading the news, articles and watching his interview - made me feel that maybe it's not so much beneficial to him and now I'm confused.
this cannot come out of an LLM
for example: provenance identity community
so the correct thing to do for artists is to figure out what does work in this world
society is going to choose: "superhuman god on earth"
between "a super human god on earth" and "completely borderline copyright claims"
with all due respect to artists, this is suicide
I'm unsure how much an 84 year old can fight legally with such thin boundaries and barely any laws revolving around AI art and copyrights. But still, giving away some part of revenue generated or thanking him below the images created using the Ghibli style or some sort of accredition and any form of recognition/money could have helped.
Now, more and more artists are worried that their art form/style might get copied, which makes them hate AI even more.
and rightfully were allowed to copy the "anime style"
presumably they had previously seen anime
but SG anime did not come virgin birth from the heavens
pun intended
sure, they developed a trademark aesthetic
this is fair and appropriate. obviously SG did not invent anime. they saw some anime before them and copied that right?
SG has copyright on their characters, but it is impossible to have copyrights for a style
you see, world peace is nigh
Honestly too difficult to fight on brain the messages are out of time/sequence
so far at least
nor have they asserted one AFAIK
but I am not sure they have a copyright claim
for example
one should not make the Ghibliator app
i think they logically have trademark protection
regardless of the above
and fwiw in Japan it is legal to train AIs on copyrighted content