Oceans of Wisdom

lets talk about redundancy for a second

we covered security

but this is redundancy not security

i dunno could we collectively own a swiss cave maybe

but for redundancy if you a second copy of something

for security it is a honeypot

we could in principle have some network owned infrastructure for redundancy not for security

but this is a material improvement to current state of the art

nothing is 100% perfect ok

you just need the time lock to be materially longer than any possible plausible kidnapping lol

correct!

agree with all the @[gpebbles] timelock comments

and there you want 2 days in a different safe

maybe you want to keep some ETH handy

like maybe on JPGs it is 6 months

and people can set timelock to their desired length

the idea is basically: 1/ time lock 2/ plus legible "we all use the same signer alt to timelock that people may learn won't sign" 3/ plus emergency exit from timelock in case of "bug in safe" "blockchain migration etc"

because otherwise what is to prevent the attacker from not even hitting me on the head but just stealing my laptop and coming here and saying "hey bros, help me amount i put a tx in, can you please sign it, need to do this mint"

only blockchain/network level topics

they have to agree to basically not sign individual requests

all of these are less credible "baseball bat resistent" than 5,000 people around the world who have socially agreed to not sign

because someone is logically going to think that any other address is your family, friends, colleagues or at worse banker/lawyer/etc

no individual address can make as powerful a committment

only network issues like quantum etc

network can make credible committments that they don't respond to individual situations

it is why you need to make the network museum a stakeholder

to save the museum's affiliated collections

well that is the type of thing i could see the gang getting together and authorizing a series of txt to migrate everyone's safes

and you are going to miss the window and now vitalik will steal your jpgs (he's been playing long game saving money not buying them to steal them later)

and you have timelocked yourself to 6 months

let's say there was in fact a quantum threat

what do i mean

but not impossible

there is an address that is very hard to get to vote

and in fact it is a feature of our network

otherwise I think it is quite good

this is why i have not yet pushed

the hard issue with my idea is for the nerds not to decide it is a collective investment scheme that each of you are running

yes sure this is the easiest of issues

bc if 10,000 people use it

could potentially be credible

whereas "wewontsign.6529.eth" as the main signer

the thing that holds me back is things like "vitalik changes the blockchain and you need to move your stuff" and it does not make it to the quantum resistant blockchain etc

it has unironically crossed my mind

or in the backyard

"sure, you probably just have this under the couch"

may think

bc the attacker may thing

the beatings to my head with a baseball bat may continue

bc if it is any other address