1 good xcopy edition
Probably be like $1-1.5 m, so I agree with you
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
20,678
matching drops
#1574220
2026-10-24 20:01
so it is still fairly inexpensive to get to my run-rate in the scheme of things
so DGMD is now accruing +41,236 TDH per day (2/3rds of punk6529)
but that is obviously ridiculous
by our logic, BTC should be a big failure
is my point
i just think the group is very hard on itself sometimes
What is the Overton Window for meme cards necessary to keep Team 6529 on message for 15 years?
glad to hear that i have infinite liquidity
Yes, it isn’t a direct hedge, but is a buffer and balancer. provides better cushion, and in a non-linear manner when prices increase. So more destroyed hence more share. And if prices drop, there’s less demand for more cards, so the natural absorber of excess supply is him again. So more cards and more TDH share.
and it is obviously vastly more centralized than TDH
and now up to the level of nation-states
that it is in fact sufficiently decentralized
because team BTC has managed to stay on message for 15 years
it is useful to understand
by extrapolating this group's logic, this is basically a centralized non-viable protocol. I assume that is why it is worth $0.
let me introduce you to a cryptocurrency known as "Bitcoin" that, like TDH, can be subjected to a 51% attack.
Let's check in on how centralized it is and if someone has more than 2.5% of voting power
1/ obviously i have done nothing malicious
2/ but also all of this whining that you can't be bothered to find 2.5% of the vote IF I (or anyone else) did something malicious is unbecoming
sorry, there are two separate issues here
ok sure
if I was single and not watching a baby in a precarious spot I’d try to research who was where
yes, I am trying to "centralize power" but spending an infinite amount of time trying to decentralize it
I think intentions matter, we can argue he (and others) could right now use his TDH in a malicious or aggressive way to centralize power "unfairly"... is he though? and are others doing it?
i dunno what to tell you
if all of you are going to turn into immediate crybabies at a 2.5% attack
and some attacker gathers 2.5% of TDH and attacks
and my validator goes offline
imagine i decide in 2026 to go on vacation
sorry this is loser talk
"Area politician gathers 2.5% of the vote. all others immediately surrender to this overwhelming show of force"
trying again
sorry math errors
This is a legitimately good defense but as a test we should try it
it is not my fault if everyone wants to be lazy
Challenge everyone to over come it
nonsense
The fact remains it’s not overcomeable in practice
"Community members demand punk6529 sells his cards"
You’re not accounting for destroyed TDH. He never sells. So all market activity helps maintain the share.
good analogy
How it is working now is more like the voting before the 24h is the primaries. It puts up the candidates that most are likely to put most of their votes towards
if someone says "who are you going to vote for in November" and I say "Biden" but later I actually vote RFK in the poll booth, do I have any obligation to Biden because before I said Biden? I think not
you can take away your vote at any time before 24 hours and have no consequences on the final vote. once you get into the 24 hour period, there are consequences to your vote even if you change it later.
so I dunno, isn't the pre-24 hour period more like "polling" rather than a "vote"
you can take away your vote at any time before 24 hours and have no consequences on the final vote. once you get into the 24 hour period, there are consequences to your vote even if you change it later.
so I dunno, isn't the pre-24 hour period more like "polling" rather than a "vote"
One question on clarification of the term "Pre-voting" what do you mean by that? And when does "Voting" occur?
nobody thinks i voted down a good card or voted up a bad card that did not have full community support
that is it
you are upset that the pre-voting order changed
this is not the issue
Technically we can all compete with you but practically I don’t see it
push #3 to #1 on cards that you just said everyone agreed with is "a hammer"?
I can probably find but I think you said you were gonna try not to be a hammer
I am old enough to remember 3 weeks ago when "OMG what horrible things did punk mean by NOT VOTING for Chris"
there is incredible selective memory around here
i said i would mostly not vote?
Punk shoulda just said from the beginning ‘I will vote as i wish’ instead of saying he will mostly not vote unless there is a big issue and then backtracking on that while also pretending he didn’t backtrack
this is like "my steak is not shaped like a cow so it is not a cow"
it was obviously happening
everyone knew that there were artists in queue
right but this is just childish right?
no one knew
so, so far, this is an obvious negative of the decentralized process but I do not know if it inevitable or can be just culturally adjusted
for the 23rd week running
exactly nobody ever complained that we used our (100% power) to defer artist X once again
and so long as you guys did not see the sausage being made in the sausage factory