how you use TDH to prevent "block production centralization"
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
20,671
matching drops
#1572544
2026-10-24 12:50
need to check performance requirements, how you round robin
it is, in principle, better
and others just check the proof
but with ZKP you can actually just have one node at any time create the proof
the consensus mechanism: you can do VRF with validation by all nodes
that is it
max is probably: The Memes, Gradients, NextGen and Stream and the min is The Memes and Gradients and we treat NextGen and Stream as shadow
another reason to not have a lot of collections that are protocol collections
so they live in parallel
1/ we probably need to run the collections (the main ones) bridgeable to our own chain just in case ETH mainnet gas gets out of control
the big ones are
then the issues become more technical in nature
bc this is the base for the security
see if the gaming is within control
try to break it etc etc
run with it for a SZN fully algorithmic but with a centralized backend
see if we can get it fully algorithmic
we need to push the envelope now on the TDH / Edition Size / AL / Shadow TDH topic
I do not want to leave discretion in the core mining / security algorithm
this is why in my ideal world
bc the BTC people are very obviously OG boomers who have no plans to touch anything meaningful in the chain
from a value / rugging perspective
but BTC feels more solid
ETH has lower inflation than BTC
whereas ETH does things
is that the BTC people are like "this is it we are not changing"
the biggest benefit BTC has vs ETH
it is not trust building
obviously the mining algo can't be changing all the time
Meme Cards are our miners
TDH is our Proof of Work
yes but the security mechanism is TDH
Ok yes. got it. So not TDH calc logic per se, but you’re deciding on the architecture of the new chain.
the hardest one being ZKP
are whole universes of decisions
but behind that simple statement
in principle those incentives will be "round robin weighted by TDH" block creation and you get a fungible token that can be used for gas etc
to stay running
and needs incentives for validators
and needs validators
needs to go into blocks
for us to decentralize, everything that goes now into the AWS databsae
the biggest hardest topic is consensus mechanism, ZKP and bridging in and out of L1s/L2s
it is extra TDH of some type
your TDH is still where it was
it is not wrapped though
Instead of “Shadow TDH”, why not “wrapped TDH” like term used for fungible coins?
the biggest hardest topic is consensus mechanism, ZKP and bridging in and out of L1s/L2s
The logic that’s there now seems to be enough. Apart from locking in the formula for edition sizes, and then the boost discussion earlier, what else do you see changing at the protocol level?
The shadow TDH etc. seems more to be like tooling on top - for better and better decision making, which guess would continue.
It doesn’t fundamentally alter the TDH calc.
Also the logic on 2x of total memes TDH for the universe of possibility is already a logic, right? one can potentially do the calculation and prioritize things under that hard cap. So it’s still decision making, not protocol logic changing.
these are the things we need to think through carefully
or maybe the TDH will start pulling them into the alignment with the network
maybe they will act maliciously
I have no idea how that person will act