exact same issue but given how AL prioritizes prior SZN+current SZN TDH
Context from
DGMD
#219178
2025-08-02 21:53
who is trying to be a new whale
but even in principle what is the mechanism by which it blocks anyone
leaving aside that it is immaterial - we have a handful at most of people with multiple sets
by which it rewards OGs
what is the mechanism
why is that?
Context from
purchardus
#219180
2025-08-02 21:54
Just to clarify. The issue is there is a concern that the current model will reward OG full set holders too handsomely, and new potential whales (I don’t think this concern will necessarily apply to small fish) will be upset they don’t have a reasonable path to “new whale” status?
blockchain stays the same; encryption algorithm replaced in a hard fork
change
but blockchains will chain
quantum will happen
manageable; algos will be swapped out
Context from
Scamart
#219163
2025-08-02 21:50
what about quantum.. is that gonna be a threat to crypto?
but we have to see
hope so
the only question if we are up to the job
i haven't for a very long time
i have zero zero zero doubt about the shape of the future
it will all happen in the next 5 years
ASI, crypto adoption, NFT adoption, all the 2nd and 3rd order effects
it is all going to happen
me: we need permissionless sybil resistant for everything
@[boredsurgeon]: why, web has all this stuff but better
me: because one day the web will be permissioned
@[boredsurgeon]: oh come on
me: August 2025, UK
in a galaxy far away
@[DGMD] and @[Thor] should weigh in too
the alignment assumptions
need to make sure it does not break
and very difficult
it is both very promising
and focus on shadow TDH
I want to get this done
but we are also asymtoping to close to the best possible formula
and see if there is anything else to improve in the next iteration
make the shift
so we should get to our best view on what that is
broadly something in this direction is more correct than present
I would like to make the switches to TDH and AL next week
let's push the thinking
yup
yes
the other one does not cap it either
Context from
david
#219127
2025-08-02 21:39
but it doesn't cap it so there is always an incentive
isn't the right answer here to get the formula right to make splitting unproductive
Context from
MoMO
#217896
2025-08-02 05:34
Feel like an elegant solution 👍
While we are at it, what’s the view on retrospective consolidation? e.g. if one keeps szn sets in different wallets intentionally and won’t consolidate. As boost can be applied anytime, there’s no rush to do it sooner, and also no penalty to do it later. Should there be an incentive or penalty?
From a game theory perspective, not knowing which large stakeholder has what total TDH, has an impact. And the higher the base, the higher the boost potential on the total absolute number, if done later in the game.
you can still conceivably monkey around with the image on-device BUT
a) much harder
b) and in any case you have proof that at least at that specific moment in time, that image existed
hash and post the hash as it happens
you are effectively done
you cover the X largest phone manufacturers and Canon, Nikon, Leica
are taken on cameras from a handful of manufacturers
very high % of world photos
it was such a good idea
yes! 2018 or something
Context from
johndoe8891
#218977
2025-08-02 18:29
I hope I’m remembering it correctly, but I believe punk ones shared a story on how he recommended it to company, but it was too early for them to grasp the significance of the idea
once N = high
reduces the incentive in later years