i will rewrite the current one formally so we can poke holes but there is no reason it won't be doable
Context from
MoMO
#219702
2025-08-03 06:24
Kidding, but it will depend on AL calc. You have an algorithm in mind for that?
isn't that solved here

@[Andre] see above please and propose a plan
yes something like that. we won't give up the name
Context from
johndoe8891
#219520
2025-08-03 02:01
this part should be easily solvable besides if they deactivated it if there is no activity.
If not the team can leave a final message that we don’t have any other discord and just leave it open and disable any input
just a few but it is a nice point
I like the idea of putting a handful of spots on random card TDH to encourage diversity
that benefit from splitting
based on the proposal
Please tell me a specific set of card holdings
I don't understand
Context from
MoMO
#219650
2025-08-03 05:55
You smoothed the curve for exponential decline so it harmonizes the boost problem.
But it doesn’t yet resolve the AL problem. Still preferential. No?
The calculation one would do is what’s the worth of latest Szn boost % + preferential AL.
you are very early
Context from
Saed
#218803
2025-08-02 15:56
I punish myself cause I joined late imo to this cool active great community! I love watching many great guys are building the culture together, the best place in metaverse that I've experienced!
I appreciate for all my supporters from day one, for all the Reps, Follows, Rates , Votes and Comments ! :sgt_saluting_face:
as well as the edition size
and it should also be algorithmic
but it should be on the site
it is in the powerpoints
we need to write out the AL math formally too
if there is, please share it!
i don't think there is in the proposed plan an incentive to split
Context from
MoMO
#219594
2025-08-03 05:04
Yeah. We been thinking as well, but nothing comes to mind as a permanent decentralized fix.
The whole boost and three wallets thing is brilliantly designed, and the curve now will be perfect. But because we are playing on last 4 Szns on a separate preferential basis (for boost and for AL), it introduces this element of ‘when’ in the mix. ‘when’ to optimize for AL, ‘when‘ to get the boost.
but you need a base set of people, a core this way
no, of course not
does everyone for all time need to be this way?
is motivated and aligned
and instead whoever makes it here and figures out
they deter the casual farmer, the casual flipper, the low information token trader
serve a purpose
not yet. i do finished work only. but also these very strict gates (formal or informal) on who can get to the real story
Context from
MoMO
#219585
2025-08-03 04:54
You may want to post this on X and say join us? 😅
Last + This SZN SZN TDH also gives you spots
the way it is structured
the only right answer is not never be in a position where that letter comes to you
bc it is one of those things that there is no right answer
absolutely nobody (myself included) is going to want to deal with that
dissident
it can't be "someone has to decide if they are going to comply with a Turkish court order to unseal the conversations of a dissent"
i think it either has to be full public or full private
it has to be decentralized
for it
and we will get heat
it is good
you probably need to be private to avoid ending up with an ASBO
but if you want to set up the "Secret Underground Society To Install A/C in London"
bc i think needed for alignment
like main-stage and TDH can be public
should be default private
the chain except for consensus
i think (not 100% sure, but I think)
i think it is how the chain should work
it is more than that
i think i can do it once I get to the point that I am sure I am not saying stupidities about ZKP
better to keep my mouth shut until I have a version that is comprehensible