on ETH
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
20,635
matching drops
#1553800
2026-10-20 16:15
I have dozens of addresses
bc over time, people will change addresses a lot
and I would like to think about the crypto incentives to avoid it
is a bit of a hack
but the "you can only use 3 or 4 or 5 address"
actually quite important
many reasons
is very good for many ways
that TDH updates once a day
no, not that
The time gap is good in a way. Helps monitor the network if something is going on.
I would like to change that
is also a bit of a kludge-y approach
in the beginning it was definitely like this (like you say)
Ah interesting. great to know. We had tested it right in the beginning days to plan. So if it’s changed now, haven’t tested lately.
is also a bit of a kludge-y approach
the number of wallets thing
let's wait for @[prxt0]
but I would not bet my life on it
not sure. it used to be that way. but then people were freaking out when they de/re-consolidated and would lose their TDH for a few hours so I think we now do some changes in real-time
The TDH won’t tally, no? Coz unless we let that TDH block pass at the 24th hour, the new consolidated TDH won’t register.
have not thought about this exact scenario before
so I don't want to go out on a limb
it might be like @[MoMO] said
I want @[prxt0] who built the algorithm to weigh in
but I am not 100% sure
in which case it can be done in a day
we process consolidation changes in real-time I think
@[prxt0] look at the above and we discuss tomorrow
he might be right
funny
actually no
oh
if he does it on the weekend, I think it can be done in one day
https://6529.io/my-stream?wave=893867b5-0d04-4316-b594-a5ac6d19e6e3&serialNo=219567
but it is downstream from the AL system
the subscription system should ofc follow the AL system
what you mean is the AL system. I will write it up
Yes more nuance and flexibility within subscription system - but without changing the underlying logic (subscription logic and flexibility within a silo = same as current subscription logic and flexibility within a profile). And all within one profile. Basically you can have various silos and commit eth to each silo independently
I agree with myself now
yes agreed, should be exponential smoothing
I like the "Elegant" solution better than the original proposal because the cliff gets worse over time and would be seen by new set collectors.
Example: I hold a full SZN 97 and it is the transition to SZN 101.
SZNs 101, 100, 99, and 98 get 5% boost.
My SZN 97 boost drops from 5% to 0.78% instantly and that set is only 1 year old.
play around with the curve
Lgtm, I think we can change the curve to be higher the previous 5-10 seasons always and then a bigger drop maybe
no that breaks the general principle that I like of fixed TDH generating capability per drop
I made a comment before, what if TDH per card goes up a fixed % each season
or @[prxt0]
@[ragne]
When viewing a profile from a tagged name, it’s still taking me out of the mobile app to a web link.
Alignment. Identity. Decision-Making
insert cat typing gif
Gm barrr! What’s everyone up to this weekend? 😄
ofc we will not delete!
Archive to ready only, there are some great convos and history stored in that group.
your direct economic incentive is to consolidate
i want to be able to say, from TDH=1 to TDH = 100,000,000
even small ones
which is why I do not want to leave any holes in the system
without this, the timeline darkens.
the whole memes project can be thought of as a way to get to this
Ha. Ok. you’re sneaky 😅. guess done then.
All our advantage is gone.