i think those SZNs will do well ofc, but surely the protocol over decades should not be optimized around them :)
Context from
GhostPepper
#221023
2025-08-03 20:32
I think I finally understand what’s been nagging me about the proposal.
I will work it into a formula and we will go ahead and implement
I think this is basically done
indeed
Context from
GhostPepper
#221219
2025-08-03 22:40
Side note. @[punk6529] needs to mint this 2022 artifact on Stream: 
Back in the day when TDH stood for "Total Day's HODLed"
price dynamics currently in your favor...
Context from
stardust
#222481
2025-08-04 18:09
hey everyone .i was waiting for today’s meme to show up in my wallet, but then i realized the last meme #388 got sent even though i had unsubscribed so i didn’t check again, and ended up missing today’s. has anyone else had this happen?
there was an issue with the sub on Friday so this could have happened @[prxt0]
Context from
stardust
#222481
2025-08-04 18:09
hey everyone .i was waiting for today’s meme to show up in my wallet, but then i realized the last meme #388 got sent even though i had unsubscribed so i didn’t check again, and ended up missing today’s. has anyone else had this happen?
cloud is centralized
the chain vs the cloud but otherwise i agree
Context from
meysvm
#220437
2025-08-03 14:08
this is meme idea ! fr
you use the possessive when you mean the plural!
Context from
TonySellen
#220601
2025-08-03 15:52
Did you know……. Money For JPEG’s had the power to be so much more than a meme?
Yet the image upset people, it was too “real”.
sad really.
totally
Context from
maybe
#220579
2025-08-03 15:36
Daemon Enterprises
like think about all the European vendors who are going to want a VAT number
but we might need to tbd
just to do this stuff
and don't have to have one of those wyoming legal structures
ideally we can pull it off
is going to confuse a lot of people
"you have been paid by a global decentralized protocol"
the funny part is "where will they send the invoice to"
Context from
MoMO
#220386
2025-08-03 13:40
That’s the future anyway. No one has been able to crack it though. Too much friction on local regulations
etc etc
we are by default global
there are smart people everywhere
NY/SF pricing should be generally priced out of our RFPs
not NY/SF pricing
and we should take advantage of global pricing
I am have been a CEO of real businesses for a long time; I know how to do a lot of things myself, I have a very good sense of how much things cost; it won't be one of these "SV startup or crypto protocol over funded wastes hundreds of millions of dollars and then wonders where it all went"
I think I am good at this
TBQH
network should ruthlessly seek out the best value for money for everything
nothing else
we can have only one goal; the network wins
i do not think the majority of christian churches over millenia were funded by government tax money
Context from
Bic
#220232
2025-08-03 12:28
Really a good post. I learn, and got stuck on Christianity example.. There are lot of churches because government funded them with tax money. Why would government fund network state.. hmm..
95% of the proposals should be won by people who have nothing to do with us
and like 1,000 actively engaged here
there are 8B people out there
the likelihood that an existing community member is "the best person from a cost/value perspective" to deliver any specific job is close to nil
but this is horrifically wrong
is that "here is a pool of money and let's find a away, that we, the DAO members can absorb it"
i think the thing that happens to be more precise
for our RFPs
so we generate competitive proposals
I will tweet the sh-t out of the RFPs
all in public
anyway we will run a corporate++++ process
also a feeling that it is other people's money
Context from
MoMO
#220354
2025-08-03 13:33
Alignment is missing. Also the biggest problem in our view is the disengaged whale issue.
Which doesn’t exist here to a large degree.
"absolutely under no circumstances do it that way"
so there is nothing to learn from them except
has been a complete clownshow
generally DAO voting on this type of stuff
step 5: pick from the X approved projects, which want you would be willing to direct your protocol share to
step 4: pick one