they are also irresponsible with their TDH even without the extra step of allocating to a cat
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
20,635
matching drops
#1553800
2026-10-20 16:15
so if they are irresponsible
it is theirs
keep in mind that if they do not allocate it to the cats
5/ they did not take it back for themselves
4/ the collection collapsed
3/ they have allocated it to a shit collection
2/ that a fraction of that that is the multiplier is also materially large (even harder)
1/ has a materially large amount of TDH relative to the network (that nobody other than museum and I have right now)
you would have to assume that someone
so for this example
and is reversible
I think it is rate limited by the fact that TDH is expensive
Fluid TDH is a great name.
I see how good fluid TDH could be but the damage it can do is also big.
Lets take meta mask for example everyone understands it’s you responsibility to check on everything you sign etc. but they had and have a lot of pressure to improve their dedication of malicious things and make it obvious, so while I understand will make it clear all over it’s still a big risk, like the punk example someone gives them all TDH in 100 years they are leaving and using the system suddenly one day it’s gone it feels wrong. I don’t have a solution it just feels like we are inviting dram.
Then with rememe is it gated if not people in 100 years can start minting whatever they want there and gate fluid TDH
also eventually one person can ruin it for everyone he decided he believes in a cat art collection he gave it millions of TDH it collapses so one easily buys the nfts just for the tdh and they have easy TDH, then again maybe it’s a one off, but it still feels like we are opening a can of worms, but the upside is also extremely high 🤷♂️ 🤯
great thread @[sqda]
https://x.com/sqda/status/1953417877635154339?t=PtQIGrkYbqpDFF1VT4zdoQ&s=19
we just have not done it
i think it is in principle doable
to be ok
to find a way to have sufficient checking of it (automated)
it is on the to-do list
someone could put something malicious in front of hundreds of people
if we allow it in mainstage
it was low risk
when they were submitting to us in a DM of 3 people
to protect against malicious submissions
we need to have some mechanism
when every meme gets 50M TDH from Huge from proxy
and not @[HugoFaz]
same guy that only picked 2 winners, thinks HE will get the proxy
https://x.com/screaminbutcalm/status/1105577845642878976?lang=en
i want that proxy vote
hmmmm
so we will see
want more power in the later stage
and looks like some people momo for example
not bad tbh
well, ok
agree but I think there is one set of voters who get things into the top 6-8 and another who curate that top 6 into the winner.
not "not nice"
I think that is nice
when they are clearly GMI
to support the artist
if everyone piles on in the end
the issue would be if X people were pushing stuff that was clearly bad for reasons of their own
i see nothing wrong with this
and we repeat
we set it through
and then there is coalescing on one
that we use the lower ranks to look at stuff
and good
no, i think it is normal
I think a lot of people just flip flop between the likely winners vs have conviction votes on long shots.
you would have run me out of town
imagine me picking for 2 whole seassons and you guys only liking 2 of them