15,962 matching drops
#1174313 2026-07-07 16:25
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #860047 2026-04-05 13:18
https://x.com/DriftProtocol/status/2040611161121370409
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #855402 2026-04-03 14:06
the system continues to work!
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #855401 2026-04-03 14:06
https://6529.io/waves/a2ed7791-6402-4333-9780-d7af1fdce918 glad to see the self-nominations! good and sensible set of people!
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #853545 2026-04-02 22:49
and that every social media site has a timeline
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #853543 2026-04-02 22:49
there was a reason we had a timeline
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar Reply #853542 2026-04-02 22:49
we need something; we have a real issue with discoverability and with tracking waves
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #853541 2026-04-02 22:48
dominant position by @[HugoFaz] ![Seize](https://d3lqz0a4bldqgf.cloudfront.net/drops/author_0f831714-87b4-11ee-9d82-029a0e4b6159/43d909fd-c1ae-409b-a1b9-7ae0a2c62d27.png)
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #853518 2026-04-02 22:30
and dropping in other waves etc
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #853514 2026-04-02 22:28
🚨🚨6529 NETWORK MUSEUM SIGNER NOMINATIONS AND VOTES 🚨🚨 https://6529.io/waves/a2ed7791-6402-4333-9780-d7af1fdce918
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #853505 2026-04-02 22:25
bc there are no nominations yet
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #853499 2026-04-02 22:24
@[simo] the signer wave, is it live?
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar Reply #853497 2026-04-02 22:24
ok pls implement when you can
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #853496 2026-04-02 22:24
cc @[prxt0] @[GelatoGenesis] @[ragne] @[6529er]
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #853494 2026-04-02 22:23
i think this is a good idea to test
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #853492 2026-04-02 22:23
we can allow read without logging in
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #853490 2026-04-02 22:23
so if anyone can see the group
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar Reply #853489 2026-04-02 22:22
we could try read only on public groups @[simo]
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #841678 2026-03-31 06:01
@[simo] @[prxt0] @[GelatoGenesis] please confirm status
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #841672 2026-03-31 06:00
https://x.com/i/status/2038842907466334550
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar Reply #840442 2026-03-30 22:49
i think we can do a time lock in SAFE
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #840441 2026-03-30 22:49
and then TBD to the network museum
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #840439 2026-03-30 22:48
you could do internal to the other card holders to start
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #840434 2026-03-30 22:48
they are not likely selling to an unrelated party
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #840433 2026-03-30 22:48
that if someone is selling way under market
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #840430 2026-03-30 22:47
there is no way to know who is a related party onchain anyway
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #840428 2026-03-30 22:47
solves majority doing stupid deals
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar Reply #840427 2026-03-30 22:47
no dude, just ROFR in general
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #840423 2026-03-30 22:47
classic minority protection
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar #840421 2026-03-30 22:46
i don't know why were we so dumb
punk6529 Maybe's Dive Bar Reply #840420 2026-03-30 22:46
no obviously not for that - for related party sales in the other ones (the ones people affiliate with the NFTs they own and sell stakes)