16,161 matching drops
#1227282 2026-07-22 00:03
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #195239 2025-07-19 09:46
we do it all in public here!
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195238 2025-07-19 09:46
the issue is that people are using it tactically for the higher value cards right?
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195237 2025-07-19 09:45
if all high TDH people said "we want to buy 3 of every card then editions would be 600 or whatever and we would have plenty of P0 spots"
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195236 2025-07-19 09:45
P0 is not a fixed scarce number
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195233 2025-07-19 09:44
good
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195232 2025-07-19 09:44
but I think the idea of precommitting is also goo
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195231 2025-07-19 09:44
you might miss out on something special at 3M
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195230 2025-07-19 09:44
so that if you split your 3M into 1.5M each
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195228 2025-07-19 09:44
it needs to be TDH based too
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195227 2025-07-19 09:44
if we do surprises
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #195226 2025-07-19 09:43
full sets won't solve high TDH not full set splits
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #195225 2025-07-19 09:43
TDH is the only thing that matters but the only reason TDH is a good metric is because the whole system was designed to make TDH a good metric. AL is a tool to make TDH work
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195220 2025-07-19 09:42
fine that is OK
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195219 2025-07-19 09:42
so if someone says "sure I am truly genuinely trying to buy every card in SZN 15 x 3 and I have a lot of TDH sure"
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195217 2025-07-19 09:42
in advance of knowing the winner
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195216 2025-07-19 09:42
we allocate P0 for people who commit / subscribe to P0
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195215 2025-07-19 09:41
I think that is tricky. how about this
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195213 2025-07-19 09:40
where in principle if you are high enough in TDH to be able to get into P0 even if split in two, you can trade off neutral to lower TDH for more AL spots
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195212 2025-07-19 09:39
now we need to address the question of high TDH non-full set
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195211 2025-07-19 09:39
so with #1, if you have a full set your incentive is to consolidate because you get the same number of AL spots and more TDH
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195210 2025-07-19 09:38
so i do not want to full myself/ourselves that we are doing things when they are trivially fakeable
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195209 2025-07-19 09:38
you have just described (correctly) a trivial way a high TDH holder can take one of the spots for "new collector" by simply having another wallet
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #195206 2025-07-19 09:37
of course this is the reason but if we lock the front door but have the side door wide open then the reason is not going to be effective
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195205 2025-07-19 09:37
imagine I have: 3 full sets, 1 in one wallet, 2 in another wallet and a third wallet with SZN-1 and SZN(current) TDH: I get 3 AL now in the new adjusted #1, I also get 3 AL and higher TDH
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195203 2025-07-19 09:36
just the TDH split issue remains
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #195202 2025-07-19 09:36
made another small adjustment to 1d. with that adjustment, I think the set split issue goes away
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195200 2025-07-19 09:35
but this is just deceiving ourselves
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195199 2025-07-19 09:34
they just look like a "new collector" to us
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #195198 2025-07-19 09:34
fake news though. if an existing high TDH collector can get around it by having a second wallet, they are not a "new collector"
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195196 2025-07-19 09:33
instead of 1
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195195 2025-07-19 09:33
you get 2 ALs
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195194 2025-07-19 09:33
forget full sets for a second
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195193 2025-07-19 09:33
into 1.5M each
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195192 2025-07-19 09:33
you split it
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195191 2025-07-19 09:32
if you have 3M TDH
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195190 2025-07-19 09:32
or you are saying
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195189 2025-07-19 09:32
would get the same AL split or unsplit now
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195188 2025-07-19 09:32
and I think the scenario you described
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195187 2025-07-19 09:32
AL is only addressed in #1
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #195186 2025-07-19 09:32
2 is just for TDH, not AL
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195183 2025-07-19 09:30
so now is the time to push on it
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195182 2025-07-19 09:30
because at some point I think it is going to be important to decentralize it, put it in stone, hard to change
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195181 2025-07-19 09:29
I want to take a push now this SZN to solve / harden the TDH and AL algorithm
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195180 2025-07-19 09:29
I think this is what you are talking about
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195179 2025-07-19 09:29
look at the new 1(d)
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195176 2025-07-19 09:28
but this is also in principle solvable in the same way
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195175 2025-07-19 09:28
i think the scenario that you are right is because we give AL spots to new sets for current SZN
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195174 2025-07-19 09:27
you split, you also get 3 AL spots?
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195173 2025-07-19 09:27
you get 3 AL spots
punk6529 Memes-Chat #195172 2025-07-19 09:27
you have 3 sets, you get the AL spots