ok tell me what you are thinking
Context from
maybe
#517525
2026-01-15 22:33
I don’t trust anyone
"you wouldn't mind if I just take a lil' slice of that for my lab?"
"keep a close eye on your kidneys around him"
Context from
Animated_6529
#517510
2026-01-15 22:30
I have never heard of this boredsurgeon character. Can someone explain him in one sentence?
why have you not yet assembled a squad?
Context from
maybe
#517457
2026-01-15 22:12
On topic, I refuse to let someone else do the lock without a fight
ha i can reply now so the answer to this is Stream!
Context from
gpebbles
#517502
2026-01-15 22:25
i do not want to bring you off topic.. in this vein of decentralized societies.. there was a great spaces last night that @[Animated_6529] led.. and to me one of the more interesting things that hit me was as we grow to be size of nyc .. one of the things we solve is the fact that more art will be sold/transacted here not via memes.. like way more.. only 156 memes minted a year.. 156 pieces of art will be sold hourly in the future here.. so just moreso interesting to think about that and wanting to encourage artists still to come here regardless of meme card success.. and to continue that thought more science will happen here than jsut meme cards.. more conservation and charity.. etc etc..
that is great!
Context from
tito
#517505
2026-01-15 22:27
i'm totally here for the 6529 Science era. BTW Punk did you see my trip to Mauna Kea? Posted CO2 data to L1 from 13,803 feet https://6529.io/waves?wave=b6128077-ea78-4dd9-b381-52c4eadb2077&serialNo=504183
that will handle the nfts that matter but not selected as a meme card
@[gpebbles] I do not know if I am a boomer or of @[simo] has banned me from replying to replies but anyway the answer to your question is Stream
also, @[boredsurgeon] also personally guaranteed to me that when he wins the Nobel Prize in Medicine based on this work, he will personally give a Shout Out (tm) to everyone who mints his card. This is absolutely Scientific Advice and there is nothing @[6529Guardian] can do to stop me from sharing it
so this is all perfect demo case for what we want to do next
not just simple rule following
we need to be able to deliver decisions and outcomes like the rest of the world
and this is the whole point of a decentralized decision network, a decentralized society, etc, etc
as we start interacting with The Real World (tm) we will have to resolve and decide on more complex and nuanced situations because that is EXACTLY how anything important in life happens
I will try to do it for a small study in one of my cards
for scale items
but we are not there yet
maybe
will we some day have a card where we pay for everything can can decide to leave to the world at large or patent it ourselves and license to others, etc, etc
the art, the way it was done and findings enter the public sphere in different ways
principles
so I think this is correct and in line with our principels
but it was useful to think through what a fair outcome is in a case like this where we are only paying for a fraction of the real costs to run the experiment (the lab, the lab equipment, the lab staff is paid by others; we are plus or minus paying for consumables)
note that this is not to say there will be any patents to begin with; chances are very low for this type of exploratory research
open access allows for knowledge transfer, but patentability means a company may later invest to bring forward a treatment
3/ there was a further discussion about what does public domain and CCO mean in this context. obviously the card art itself is CC0. but also obviously in a very large and expensive lab like this the default is that the person who is paying the gear (the lab) and the salaries (also the lab) owns the IP (usually patents etc). This is fair under the circumstances and normal (if we were to give them say six figures, not 5 figures, you can negotiate different terms but not for the amounts we are giving).
Where he ended up on this is "the project plan is CC0 and on arweave", if this generates publishable work, it will be in an open access journal and the patent (if any) stays with the lab.
this is fair and correct and how a lot of government funding now works
2/ there was some discussion about "how much detail to share"; I had encouraged "more" and to include both technical and non-technical descriptions of what he plans to do so that a civilian can understand at an analogy level and a more technically qualified person can also understand
1/ the lab in which he works is very much An Institution (tm). I have taken on the responsibility of figuring out how to pay them so we are not going to send any ETH to @[boredsurgeon] himself. Instead I will figure out in which capacity I can get them money. We will learn something
it also will bring up a whole series of interesting topics we will need to solve
on two dimensions:
1/ it is in my view kind of the reference example so far of what a science card should be, of what moving beyond art should be, of "let's give me a taste of the full breadth of capabilities of our network
2/ he is legit, he can do what he says
have come out of voting hibernation to vote for @[boredsurgeon]'s card
it might be that the designated payee is the person selling as the land
cover all cases
those are the two most general ones
add those two fields above
Designated Payee: Yes/No
Designated Payee Name: free text
Payment Address: As now
some of them might not be a donation
and I think it is important that it says who it is
I don't think donated is the word
but I would want this if I were doing this
(I am not his tax advisor etc etc)
and to do things explicitly and transparently
the purpose is to allow teexels to avoid income tax liabilty
that has to happen via other means
the purpose of this is not to verify
how is that any different than teexels saying "mint this card and I will save 10 dolphins by donating to the WWF"
into an explicit decision, field etc etc
so i want to make designated
etc etc
and absolutely under no circumstnaces want to send them money