there is a huge difference between
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
16,161
matching drops
#1227282
2026-07-22 00:03
something like 2M TDH or 1M TDH in today's standards
or i mean .2%
1/ meme labs is ERC-1155, stream is ERC-721
2/ stream has on-chain metadata, memelabs does not
3/ memelabs is for artists and is semi-deprecated. stream is for everyone
4/ to get on stream, you still need to get at least X TDH in main stage because obviously if you don't want Stream to be a shitshow there needs to be some curation, it is just it will be something like 2% of total network TDH for a day or something and then you can trigger the mint
no
here
I think you are not thinking ambitiously enough
and they can also use TDH in a normal way
they get access to all our tooling for free
since they are only voting internally
the absolute amount relative to ours does not matter
run a wave for their project limited to TDH from their collection
choice 2: assign some fluid TDH to their project
choice 1: endless person-years of work to replicate indexing, website, voting, decentralized blockchain etc
for my project
and says "I would like to do this myself"
imagine someone looks at what we have built
on the use case for an NFT project
I had a chat with a founder of another project today
but are very appropriate for Stream
that are not appropriate for The Memes
I want to exist
there are a million things that I want to mint
no, I disagree with the idea that The Memes are the good artists and only "emerging artists not "good enough" for The Memes" will use Stream
omnibus shame.gif
https://media.tenor.com/5t7dwIkeSioAAAAC/shame-bell.gif
i think this is manageable by progressively scaling the multiplier
they are also irresponsible with their TDH even without the extra step of allocating to a cat
so if they are irresponsible
it is theirs
keep in mind that if they do not allocate it to the cats
5/ they did not take it back for themselves
4/ the collection collapsed
3/ they have allocated it to a shit collection
2/ that a fraction of that that is the multiplier is also materially large (even harder)
1/ has a materially large amount of TDH relative to the network (that nobody other than museum and I have right now)
you would have to assume that someone
so for this example
and is reversible
I think it is rate limited by the fact that TDH is expensive
great thread @[sqda]
we just have not done it
i think it is in principle doable
to be ok
to find a way to have sufficient checking of it (automated)
it is on the to-do list
someone could put something malicious in front of hundreds of people
if we allow it in mainstage
it was low risk
when they were submitting to us in a DM of 3 people