16,161 matching drops
#1227282 2026-07-22 00:03
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232910 2025-08-07 14:38
there is a huge difference between
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232909 2025-08-07 14:38
something like 2M TDH or 1M TDH in today's standards
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232908 2025-08-07 14:37
or i mean .2%
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232907 2025-08-07 14:37
1/ meme labs is ERC-1155, stream is ERC-721 2/ stream has on-chain metadata, memelabs does not 3/ memelabs is for artists and is semi-deprecated. stream is for everyone 4/ to get on stream, you still need to get at least X TDH in main stage because obviously if you don't want Stream to be a shitshow there needs to be some curation, it is just it will be something like 2% of total network TDH for a day or something and then you can trigger the mint
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232901 2025-08-07 14:35
no
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232892 2025-08-07 14:29
here
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232891 2025-08-07 14:29
I think you are not thinking ambitiously enough
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232889 2025-08-07 14:29
and they can also use TDH in a normal way
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232888 2025-08-07 14:29
they get access to all our tooling for free
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232887 2025-08-07 14:29
since they are only voting internally
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232886 2025-08-07 14:29
the absolute amount relative to ours does not matter
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232885 2025-08-07 14:28
run a wave for their project limited to TDH from their collection
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232883 2025-08-07 14:28
choice 2: assign some fluid TDH to their project
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232881 2025-08-07 14:28
choice 1: endless person-years of work to replicate indexing, website, voting, decentralized blockchain etc
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232880 2025-08-07 14:28
for my project
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232879 2025-08-07 14:28
and says "I would like to do this myself"
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232878 2025-08-07 14:27
imagine someone looks at what we have built
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232877 2025-08-07 14:27
on the use case for an NFT project
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232876 2025-08-07 14:27
I had a chat with a founder of another project today
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232874 2025-08-07 14:27
but are very appropriate for Stream
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232872 2025-08-07 14:27
that are not appropriate for The Memes
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232871 2025-08-07 14:26
I want to exist
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232870 2025-08-07 14:26
there are a million things that I want to mint
punk6529 Fluid TDH Reply #232869 2025-08-07 14:26
no, I disagree with the idea that The Memes are the good artists and only "emerging artists not "good enough" for The Memes" will use Stream
punk6529 Memes-Chat #232719 2025-08-07 13:08
omnibus shame.gif
punk6529 Memes-Chat #232718 2025-08-07 13:07
https://media.tenor.com/5t7dwIkeSioAAAAC/shame-bell.gif
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232713 2025-08-07 13:06
i think this is manageable by progressively scaling the multiplier
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232712 2025-08-07 13:06
they are also irresponsible with their TDH even without the extra step of allocating to a cat
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232709 2025-08-07 13:05
so if they are irresponsible
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232708 2025-08-07 13:05
it is theirs
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232707 2025-08-07 13:05
keep in mind that if they do not allocate it to the cats
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232705 2025-08-07 13:05
5/ they did not take it back for themselves
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232704 2025-08-07 13:05
4/ the collection collapsed
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232702 2025-08-07 13:05
3/ they have allocated it to a shit collection
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232698 2025-08-07 13:05
2/ that a fraction of that that is the multiplier is also materially large (even harder)
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232696 2025-08-07 13:04
1/ has a materially large amount of TDH relative to the network (that nobody other than museum and I have right now)
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232695 2025-08-07 13:04
you would have to assume that someone
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232694 2025-08-07 13:04
so for this example
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232692 2025-08-07 13:04
and is reversible
punk6529 Fluid TDH Reply #232691 2025-08-07 13:04
I think it is rate limited by the fact that TDH is expensive
punk6529 Memes-Chat Reply #232554 2025-08-07 11:54
great thread @[sqda]
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232535 2025-08-07 11:48
we just have not done it
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232534 2025-08-07 11:48
i think it is in principle doable
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232533 2025-08-07 11:48
to be ok
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232532 2025-08-07 11:47
to find a way to have sufficient checking of it (automated)
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232529 2025-08-07 11:47
it is on the to-do list
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232528 2025-08-07 11:47
someone could put something malicious in front of hundreds of people
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232526 2025-08-07 11:47
if we allow it in mainstage
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232525 2025-08-07 11:47
it was low risk
punk6529 Fluid TDH #232523 2025-08-07 11:47
when they were submitting to us in a DM of 3 people