Oceans of Wisdom

a lot of people who are going to mint

now in practice

ok true, but should someone who did not mint/subscribe vote on the collection funded by people who did mint/subscribe/paid for it

you might think "but the network said via TDH to push the card to be minted"

it is not necessarily the right metric for subnetwork decisions

TDH is the right metric for network decisions (what gets in the memes is a network decision)

my permanent background 6529 architecture process in my head said "whoa cowboy", do not hit "post"

and I was ready to press [tweetstorm]

but somewhere between the time @[6529er] did the work

initially my simplistic idea was the first

should this vote be: - TDH, dominated by a bunch of people who were not really into this idea and while we appreciate @[maybe] enough to get him to the main stage #1, nobody is super pumped to mint it or - the people who minted it or - some hybrid

and now we go to select the limnal spaces of Arizona State University and Santa Fe

which is great!

but @[maybe] has done "onboarding"

and so by definition these people don't even have a lot of TDH

@maybe goes and gathers all the top arizona/new mexico photographers and art collectors to get into this and rustles up the $60K to do this

wow, you say the word and he is summoned

to push the example

and let's take it one step further

and those people who are super into it mint like crazy and generate a 20 ETH fund to do this

sorry southwest

but there are like 30 people who are super into it

and for whatever reason, everyone else is like ok, cool bro, but not super duper into it

a group of you led by fearless desert warlord @[maybe] decide you want to make a collection of i dunno limnal spaces in the southeast

let's think through an example

4/ I think the alignment point was under-thought through. people who contribute to a collection should have special rights in that collection. in other words, TDH should not be the only metric used

well our whole reason for being is to make a permissionless censorship resistance composable social layer running on crypto so "on chain curation notes" are better in the same way that on-chain JPGs are better than non onchain JPGs

which is better

whereas if we call it 6529 Network Museum then each group becomes a collection

in other words, if we have 6529 Collection then each group becomes a sub-collection which is OK but not great

Also it improves the branding of the component parts

cc @[6529er] - was going to tell you this today but never got around to it :)

the word network needs to be in the main branding I think

and for better or worse 6529 museum has a brand that I need to figure out what to do with but in any case that is not today's problem

lots of people have a collection of NFTs

the interesting idea is not "we have a collection of NFTs"

3/ I think we should not call it 6529 collection; we should call it 6529 Network Museum since that is what we are doing

we can display it on our website or as a PDF but it needs to live on-chain for all the regular reasons

or "a PDF"

like it should not be "a page on our website"

2/ we are going to do the curational analysis - "where are we going to put it?" -> I think it should be on-chain somewhere - maybe it should go on the same contract as #1 as an additional field or NFT

"latter"

1/ how do we find stuff on-chain - for example - when we do meme card accessions should we buy already minted cards, or should we mint them on a common contract to improve discoverability - my gut says "later"

on two topics

I thought the decentralized museum idea needed one more turn of the crank

@[maybe] hit me in 1 minute let me get out my thoughts

something about water

or swimming

(yes, many good ideas come in the shower - the cliche is real)

but I had further shower thoughts