Oceans of Wisdom

the people who back a certain project

like on kickstarter

they have taken money out of their pocket

this is a huge indicator that they care about its success

sold it out etc

is they gave full support to the meme card

and one way we can see that they are pumped

there are 30 people super pumped about this idea

like i used above

i want to stick with a tangible exampel

rep has nothing to do with this imho

in aggregate it turns out they will not make destructive decisions for the meme cards

emotionally and financially

someone with a lot of TDH is invested in the meme cards

the alignment / game theory is different than meme cards

and using their TDH to fuck it up

and is now going to come into your art curation that your meme card is doing

and thinks this was an absolutely trash idea

and in fact hates the meme card

and did not mint the meme card

did not vote for the meme card

you will be a more "qualified" voter than someone who to take an extreme example

or interest in the topic

which correlates with some knowledge of the topic

which i think in practice correlates with interest

skin in the game is more accurate

but it is all a bit abstract

and people kindof nod

you don't have to use TDH

and I always tell people "you can just make a wave and use rep to vote on any mechanism you want"

is provides alignment/security for the network itself

their job and what TDH does and the only thing TDH does

and obviously the answer is "they can't"

which is "but how can high TDH holders make all the decisions in a country"

and I have not articulated well

it is interesting, it touches upon a question that I get a lot

who are qualified

but in principle our system should be scalable enough to provide a mechanism for people to do this

none of us are qualified to do this

but what if it is "plant botany classification in the SE Ecuadorian mountains"

maybe this bunch of art collectooors we are can do a decent job anyway with @[maybe] photos

and it will weaken decision-making in a case like this re societal scaling

because TDH is strictly speaking wrong

in practice today, it will make almost no difference, but we should do it correctly

1/ vote by number of cards minted 2/ vote by TDH of people who minted 3/ vote by TDH of people who minted x # of cards minted 4/ any of the above x 70% and TDH x 30% etc, but the above are indicative main patterns

now what are potential approaches

but it is not correct that it is TDH

it is why it escaped me earlier

so it is a theoretical point

have high TDH