that is one part -> the voting
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
20,633
matching drops
#1528827
2026-10-15 20:54
but may be not as much minters
who would /could be excellent curators
we have a lot of photographers here
because you know if we are doing photography
or even rep from TDH per card
One voting method that’s missing and would work for what you want is TDH vote by specific card.
as opposed to me dropping a card where the voting is "who have has CDB rep from @[BatSoupYum]"
that is potentially replicable at a principles level
I think it is worthwhile me doing something
it is fine for other people to do that
i understand this of course, but to be clear what I am saying all items like this are some version of "some idea that I came up with right now and probably does not generalize very well"
not necessarily. Rep based votes can be done based on a category given by any profile. for example I could have A vote with “Meme Maxi” and the voting weight
so I am trying to figure out what
and then I realized I did not like it
because I was going to say TDH 24 hours ago
we are discussing a specific card
this is not what we are discussing
anyway can drop any card with any mechanics they want obviously
it is too centralized for my taste
but it is not what I want to do
and someone dropping a card like that
this is fine and I have no objection to this
rep based presumably is @[6529er] and me saying "we think these 25 people are good at judging photography and we want them to pick"
photography collection for network museum
let's take this card
but rep based is pure curational
it will work for some cases
rep based is the far extreme
And this is where the ability for a rep based vote comes in imo
well at that level of abstraction it is not different. i am going to drop a meme card and I want to put the best methodology forward for my meme card, I am discussing my thoughts openly. but also of course because I am me, what i do will get copied so it is worth thinking about
To put it a different way, why is this different from any other decision making wave we create? wen I make a wave, I decide on what criteria I am using for the decision. Why does this need to be different? if people don’t like the methodology for that collection, they can vote for the same idea with different voting weights.
step 2 is something else
step 1 is of course TDH
step 2: is execution decisions
Step 1 gives you "if the network as a whole thinks this is something that the network feels is worthy, then you get some financial and moral support from the network"
so there will be 100 people
no the magic is that they will buy meme cards obviously
Sorry if it requires people actually buying photography NFTs that will leave like 4 of us to vote 😂
1/ step 1: meme card
2/ step 2: something else
what we are doing is our first "official" two step process
try to find the underlying principle
i always try to generalize and simplify
because maybe this extends to more than "how do we pick art for the network museum"
to think this through
but i want your help now
we will drop the card this weekend in any case
sure
the broader use case
it is worth pushing it because I think we possibly can use this to demonstrate
or maybe top 2 along with "but what decisions do I need to make"
it is the most common question i get asked I think
and concept
and since this is a generalizeable idea
presumably care about that project more than people who backed a different project