i know people will mint meme cards. i am asking BEYOND that what might incent people to contribute eth or NFTs to the collection
Context from
OnlyMemes
#774367
2026-03-13 00:14
I think the confusion comes from us minting memes that funds the network museum vs us donating to fund the collevtion. At least that’s what I am not understanding.
is the network better off
let's i renamed the 6529 museum to the museum of nfts
ok but right now the benefit is in favor of the network right?
Context from
RegularDad
#774361
2026-03-13 00:13
This is sorta what I was getting at. things have changed in 5 years and naming conventions that made sense in the past can be misleading now
and donate them
i don't understand this discussion - am I going to come to your house and force you to buy NFTs
eth, art, acquisitions
can decide themselves what they are going to donate
whoever donates anything to collection
so all of this concern about how we are going to spend the money that nobody has shown the slightest interest in donating is bizarre
is $100K me
$0K everyone else
right now the committed donations to the network colelction
knock yourself out
if you want to raise $100M dollars buy coz's collection and donate it to the network
no dude
Context from
arsonic
#774339
2026-03-13 00:10
but raison 100m for the network, wouldnt mean we buy only from 6529 museum right?
in general on the branding
i have always been crystal clear which i can control the sale and which i also control the sale but within a 10 year time limit
if I don't find a solution to this, it is ok, it is not the end of the world, those NFTs will be sold eventually
it is preferable to me if they are all in one place but in the fund in particularly it is not just my friends there are real institutions etc
or i find a proposition that can raise mega amounts of money for the network
ultimately in favor of the network
so either they stay out and I will manage the naming
I am not rich enough to just buy everyone out and put it here
the total fund and museum was $100M of USD
i cannot afford to do it myself
ideally, I would find people to fund getting the existing stuff into there too
so we start that now
now I see the basis for what can be truly a permanent collection - it would need to be governed by TDH etc etc
and run around buying NFTs with it
but in 2021 i had no idea how to take my friends money except to incorporate an LLC and give them units
of how to do the things I wanted to do in 2021
having now developed a much more robust idea
and now I am saying
we have to pick up the pace
Context from
maybe
#774300
2026-03-13 00:06
i'm starting to think we're 5% too slow
which is the most ridiculous start up pitch of all time
with my friends in the 6529 museum OG edition, I told them "don't ask me when I am going to sell, I may never sell, you will only get money if I sell which I am telling you I may not do ever"
and this time I want to go all the way
who are here in this chat
I would like to buy some NFTs with my new friends
now, separately, years later
and some money from friends
I took tens of millions of my money, I bought NFTs
the 6529 Museum predated the meme cards, the ideas here and so on
i don't understand what you are saying
Context from
RegularDad
#774285
2026-03-13 00:03
Idk, I understand where you are coming from, but I think the messaging get blurred because of the 6529 brand. In general 6529 seems like a public good brand. i get the funds being private, that part is clear, but the museum label also implies a public good. It’s not like I even care about being a stakeholder in it, my point was that the museum feels (unintentionally) misleading In the context of everything else.
any more than google copied the NY Times
not because we should "copy it"
MoMA is only good as inspiration
well because right now we have 0.000001% of the brand recognition and prestige of the MoMA so we need to be more innovative and use NFTs to do something that is native to our medium
Context from
arsonic
#774267
2026-03-13 00:01
why not us
