Oceans of Wisdom

now let's say I have always thought bats was a great guy

and I think those NFTs have to be able to authorize actions in his safe like transfer sell etc

has 950 NFTs and 50 in the museum

so now he has network museum branding outreach, tooling etc

and maybe in order to be aligned with the network museum, i dunno 5% of them on day 1 go into the network museum as well (again for argument's sake; don't flame me on the specifics, just trying to work out a shape)

but we can hold that thought for a second

i think they need to be NFTs not fungible coins fwiw

and that control the locks to his safe

that represent his collection

all to him

bats does some act with his collection (aligns with the network museum) -> his NFTs go into a special contract and he gets for argument's sake 1,000 NFTs on day one

and noting it is still half-baked

like let's say again sticking with an example

not by committee

i think this has to be solved by markets

that we will have paid (too much)/(not enough) for bats collection

i mean

unhappy

everyone will be happy

it is going to be a nightmare

this is not going to work

this creates an issue of "if you get network tokens based on some proposal valuation etc"

specialized in this specific topic "what are NFTs worth"

and we are specialize

including bats and me

is exactly that nobody really knows how much it is worth

imho

but part of the issue

but it is worth a lot

i don't know how much bats collection is worth

to see the issue

through an example

you have to work through example

maybe. or maybe we use the eth to pay devs etc

so I think it has to be a form of 'swap'

pay for gas for transactions

to the validators

memes have financial governance emotional network value in their own right

you get a meme card

are not a pure donation

meme cards funding a collection

to the degree that there is an answer, it is in the direction of #1

and I still can't get over that hurdle of "it is a pure donation"

i am the single most likely to want to do this

i don't buy the proposition is going to work

and then for the next decades he has transferred 8 figures of value to the network

"just give it to the network" he gets round of "you are a chad" here in the bar

if that is the complete design

I think the answer is "no"

2/ the harder case is one where someone else already owns something. they paid money for it. they want it to be in the network but lets say it is bats, he has spent millions and millions of dollars on his collection, is he just going to give it to the network