i was like, I thought I had sent good news
One person did it, and we all were botting in, we still be falling for the system
Shit Punk Says
Oceans of Wisdom
19,505
matching drops
#1505080
2026-10-09 20:33
why is everyone putting these emojies on me saying I will do the WP before Feb?
sounds fair
push a PR to github!
@[punk6529] just check tag above about how we go about the write up section for the Museum.
sounds fair
did you hear that @[punk6529] :slightly_smiling_face: ?
never mind, I used the "scroll" feature and answered my own question = done!
who do I owe money to?!
it should not be difficult; we have 5 signers. you can find them
I think holding for future purchase is the way to go, but I worry about how accessible the ETH will be once it’s in the museum wallet. Its a multi sig wallet that will be slow to move anythint
who do I owe money to?!
https://x.com/shelbycollects/status/2096959130174968263?s=46&t=N_iP65ilWw0x8Anz-aAU4w
@[DarrenSRS] please make sure every artists in Keys and Gates reads all of the above and please serve as the interface to make sure #5 and #6 get done
6/ What is everyone going to do here:
@[HugoFaz] @[maybe] @[itsjpower] @[6529er]have the cash (ETH)! It is the museum SAFE
Please work with them to organize a list of your names, ETH addresses, etc so we can give it a final check tomorrow and make the payment
5/ Q: What else do we have to do?
A: The ERC-721 Stream Contract has state of the art, museum grade provenance so I will share with you later this week what type of curational information we will ask from you.
I ask you to take it seriously. We are aiming to hit a "museum" standard on curation, not just a 1/1 photography mint.
I will return later this week with your "to-do" on this
4/ Q: What does this mean for us?
A: We will pay you your 0.5 ETH payment now, and trust that when the time comes, you will participate in the minting
3/ Q: Do you want to rush to make it ready before you feel comfortable that it is ready
A: Also no, as with NextGen, we 1-shotted a perfect contract, we will do the same here
2/ Q: is it ready?
A: No, hence the below
1/ Q: How will we mint these for the museum:
A: On the new Stream ERC-721 contract which I think will be the state of the art in in ERC-721 contracts
it is all ok though!
so we will do it this way
But it is clear that I will not be in my preferred order
First, apologize for the delay. I had thought at multiple times over the last few weeks I was closer to doing things in my preferred order than I was
I wanted to give an update on several topics
gm
it is a reach
the case that the countercase is answering
no restrictions. it is an answer to a theoretical question that someone could make about those two and the answer to that theoretical question is the museum can contextualize if it wants.
in any case, I think the negative case is a reach
I am VERY supportive of accepting this gift and also I would like to lodge a question on the proposal.
... for some reason I can't see the whole drop on laptap but on the mobile app there is a clear discrepancy between the proposal and the terms:
1. The proposal highlights the tensions with Salgado's work between beauty, romance, suffering and grandeur. The "response to the countercase" states "Tokens 2216 and 4697 should be displayed with exact community context and with scholarship that treats the Marubo and Yawanawa as contemporary political communities"
2. The proposed gift terms, however, SPECIFICALLY carry "no permanent-display ... naming ... restriction"
I assume this is meant to imply that accepting the gift does not oblige the Museum to keep these on permanent display or to name them a certain way.
My question is whether the donor, if in fact they believe that context is essential to the works, should insist on some display conventions IF the pieces are displayed, beyond "keeping all six together"?
Or whether we are satisfied that that clause is more directed to the donor relinquishing rights over the collection and doesn't imply that the Museum will display them without due context.
cc: @[punk6529]
more later
ok gotta get some sleep
and how many hacky things you would have to do to integrate nfts, tdh, levels. rep etc
and network museum
imagine trying to run main stage in discord
i just have to find a way to move in that direction every month
i don't need to do a cost benefit analysis on every decentralization decision
you see, I believe in it a priori
this is our own thing
you need one thing
you can't have two things
yup the guiding light is decentralization
yup
What's the mission? Decentralization?
not if you are a serious person
then the answer is obviously "no"
but if the question is "can you build a decentralized network state on Discord"
and this is right for 99.99999999999999% of situations
obviously the conventional answer to "should you build your own Discord++++++" is "what are you stupid, of course not, Discord is right there and you don' t have to build it"
the key is having a mission a goal otherwise all decisions are impossible
this is how it goes
nope, everyone needs to get surprised every time, from scratch
if only you were right more often, people might actually believe you from time to time 😂
you will never believe how many people believed this would be the outcome 18 months ago (one)
The app is going to smoother than dis now
ofc ~approximately everyone thought it was a bad idea to come here, that it sucked, etc, etc why was I going to ruin everything by leaving Discord etc etc lol
feels like a completely different world
isn't it amazing that the Discord transition was only 18 months ago
I was actually talking about this yesterday. there are probably a significant percentage of people that don’t even realize we had a discord 😅😭
she has the copyright on that
truly
IMO can’t have punku without memu.