Oceans of Wisdom

this whole sentiment is terrifying when trying to build a collection

https://x.com/punk8164/status/2032584621402239004?s=20

I cannot believe people are willing to part with them. You could offer me enough to solve all my probs and I still wouldn’t sell

@[punk6529] can we let him rest without an Autoglyph, Squiggle or Fidenza?

These are going to be unobtainium shortly

@[maybe] i can actually rest now

Agents hate work

Here's what's been happening (last 3 hours): Busy 3 hours with 794 messages. Early: **Key Topics and Events:** - Discussion about buying a Punk NFT collectively for the 6529 networked museum; group weighs feasibility and challenges (cost, incentives, practicality). - Technical updates: Minted 469 NFTs without Manifold Studio; focus on decentralizing processes and reducing manual steps in minting meme cards. - Ongoing development: Emphasis on open-source code, public availability of front-end and back-end repositories, and a push towards more community involvement in development. - "Stream" and "xTDH" projects: Stream is prioritized for release before xTDH due to fewer technical concerns; xTDH is still in beta and presents implementability challenges. - Deliberation on the need for greater decentralization and automation, moving away from reliance on specific individuals or platforms. - Transparent development process, but no formal public roadmap yet; developers are encouraged to check open-source GitHub repositories and contribute if interested. Mid: Summary of Key Topics and Events (Chunk 4/6): - Discussion on NFT collection sales, swapping NFTs, and representing holdings on-chain for transparency and visualization. - Proposal for network/museum co-ownership models (e.g., 5% of NFTs pledged to the network), aimed at increasing collection value, exposure, and rapid scaling. - Security becomes a central concern: how to prevent theft, address time locks, and defend against physical threats (e.g., “wrench attacks”). - Exploration of solutions, including time locks, public/legible security measures, and multi-party controls (such as requiring thousands of signatures). - Emphasis that security needs to be simple and obvious to deter attacks, with participants debating possible models for robust, user-friendly protection. - Other side discussions touch on NFT loans, user experience barriers, and comparisons of proposed mechanisms’ effectiveness. Recent: Key topics and important events summarized: - **Security and Redundancy:** Discussion centers on improving digital asset (crypto/NFT) security using time locks, redundant key/signature distribution across global locations, and the tradeoffs between convenience, security, and redundancy. - **Backup Signer Services:** Idea of network-owned or coordinated backup signer infrastructure (e.g., through banks like UBS) for ease and redundancy, as opposed to individuals managing keys/signers alone. - **Ease-of-Use:** Emphasis on making security and redundancy understandable and accessible without requiring deep technical knowledge, likening it to wealth management or trust structures. - **Custody Options:** Exploration of trusted, buffet-style custody options (like Coinbase Custody or 6529 Museum custody) with customizable features such as time locks. - **Museum Network Concept:** Proposal for a physical/global NFT art display network in partnership with companies (e.g., Samsung), adding value by rotating collections through multiple cities, and possibly monetizing it. - **Potential Scale:** Recognition that combining these approaches and services could be valuable, scalable, and impactful on the digital asset/NFT ecosystem.

should we put these notes in a Google Doc?

My cousin works at the Getty Museum

use it to pay custodians all over the world?

we can build an exchange layer. and do 0% exchange fees because the museum gets 5% of all proceeds