15,962 matching drops
#1174313 2026-07-07 16:25
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476353 2025-12-09 20:00
does not change the fact that assigning xTDH to 6529 Raw will cost nothing to index and assigning the same amount of xTDH to "every holder of $rekt" will cost many orders of magnitude more to index
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476350 2025-12-09 19:58
and it is a great way to move the discussion forward
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476344 2025-12-09 19:57
it can't be spread thin over any arbitrary indexing task
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476343 2025-12-09 19:57
the TDH-$6529 economic security has to protect the core network
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476340 2025-12-09 19:56
who is taking up the slack to keep indexing it
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476338 2025-12-09 19:56
100 years from now we are both dead
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476337 2025-12-09 19:56
and I currently incent @[maybe] to index it
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476336 2025-12-09 19:55
let's say I make an absurdist xTDH allocation
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476334 2025-12-09 19:55
the forever part is the hard part
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476331 2025-12-09 19:55
Chainlink you literally pay an indexer
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476328 2025-12-09 19:54
it has to have the bounding of $
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476327 2025-12-09 19:54
you can't let people just create unbounded indexing costs forever
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476326 2025-12-09 19:54
i am more worried about who is going to pay for it
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476324 2025-12-09 19:54
i am less worried about accuracy
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476323 2025-12-09 19:53
if you have ZKP you can check their work with the nodes
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476321 2025-12-09 19:53
but again the "we" is doing a lot of work here
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476318 2025-12-09 19:53
not right now but I can't see any reason in principle we should not support that eventually
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476317 2025-12-09 19:53
cc @[simo] @[GelatoGenesis] the above
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476313 2025-12-09 19:52
my sense is that it is close but not 100% right yet
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476306 2025-12-09 19:51
so this is the benefit of my incrementalist approach
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476304 2025-12-09 19:51
a superb idea as always ser
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476303 2025-12-09 19:51
and it is not great for that audience
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476301 2025-12-09 19:50
it starts to look like eigenlayer or something
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476300 2025-12-09 19:50
if I then add into it indexers, oracles, incentives etc etc
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476299 2025-12-09 19:50
I can explain in 5 sentences why it is 'safe'
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476296 2025-12-09 19:50
and say "TDH is extremely robust on decentralization"
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476294 2025-12-09 19:49
which is going to hard core OG crypto decentralization maxis
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476292 2025-12-09 19:49
and I am thinking about an audience that almost none of you are thinking about
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476291 2025-12-09 19:49
i am saying that this is another use case that is not covered by current implementation of xTDH
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476290 2025-12-09 19:48
that TDH is extremely robust decentralized
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476288 2025-12-09 19:48
because then you can have a cleaner story
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476286 2025-12-09 19:48
lets' have TDH and xTDH and not add them up to TDH
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476284 2025-12-09 19:48
this is what I was getting at a few weeks ago
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476280 2025-12-09 19:48
so if that is the case, I should be able to allocate green bay packers xTDH
punk6529 Freedom to Expand Reply #476279 2025-12-09 19:47
it is because you are inside the sausage making factory while the sausage is being made
punk6529 Freedom to Expand #476278 2025-12-09 19:47
and so I think we should allow the green bay packers to do this